Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2022 Dec;23(8):1717-1724. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13423. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
The Janus face metaphor approach highlights that a technology may simultaneously have two opposite faces or properties with unforeseen paradoxes within human-technology interaction. Suboptimal acceptance and clinical outcomes are sometimes seen in adolescents who use diabetes-related technologies. A traditional linear techno-determinist model of technology use would ascribe these unintended outcomes to suboptimal technology, suboptimal patient behavior, or suboptimal outcome measures. This paradigm has demonstratively not been successful at universally improving clinical outcomes over the last two decades. Alternatively, the Janus face metaphor moves away from a linear techno-determinist model and focuses on the dynamic interaction of the human condition and technology. Specifically, it can be used to understand variance in adoption or successful use of diabetes-related technology and to retrospectively understand suboptimal outcomes. The Janus face metaphor also allows for a prospective exploration of potential impacts of diabetes-related technology by patients, families, and their doctors so as to anticipate and minimize potential subsequent tensions.
两面神头像隐喻方法强调,一项技术可能同时具有两种相反的特征或属性,在人机交互中会产生意想不到的悖论。在使用糖尿病相关技术的青少年中,有时会出现接受度和临床效果不理想的情况。如果采用传统的线性技术决定论模型来解释技术的使用,那么这些非预期结果可能会被归咎于技术不够完善、患者行为不当或结果衡量指标欠佳。在过去的二十年中,这种范式显然并没有成功地普遍改善临床效果。相比之下,两面神头像隐喻方法摆脱了线性技术决定论模型的束缚,转而关注人类状况和技术的动态交互。具体来说,它可以用来理解糖尿病相关技术的采用或成功使用的差异,并回顾性地理解不理想的结果。两面神头像隐喻方法还可以让患者、家属和医生前瞻性地探索糖尿病相关技术的潜在影响,以便预测和最小化潜在的后续紧张局势。