Suppr超能文献

治疗引起的 QT 间期延长的风险。

The risk of treatment-induced QT interval prolongation.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacodependence, Universidad de Costa Rica, Costa Rica..

Pharmacy Department, Hospital Clínica Bíblica, Costa Rica..

出版信息

Farm Hosp. 2022 Mar 21;46(3):116-120.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

QT interval prolongation can increase patients' hospital stay and  mortality rate. This study aims to determine the incidence of drug-induced QT  interval prolongation and establish which QT interval measurement method is  the most appropriate for electrocardiographic monitoring.

METHOD

A retrospective observational study was conducted of patients admitted to the Clínica Bíblica Hospital during 2018. The electronic  medical records of patients hospitalized for longer than 48 hours and whose drug regimen included at least one drug potentially able to prolong the  QT interval were reviewed. Manually-measured QT intervals were corrected using Fridericia's and Rautaharju's formulae, while automatically- measured QT intervals were corrected with Bazett's formula. Risk was assessed  using the RISQ-PATH scale.

RESULTS

Of the 141 patients analyzed, 23 had arrhythmia as per their clinical  history and 14 suffered a complication during their stay in hospital. A total of  113 (80%) had a high RISQ-PATH score and only 64 were subjected to an  electrocardiogram on admission. Patients received a mean of three potentially  QT interval prolonging drugs. Most of the QT intervals measured automatically  were shorter than those obtained manually. Of all corrections, the longest QTc  interval values were obtained with Bazett's formula, and the shortest with  Rautaharju's formula. None of the patients developed TdP or complex  ventricular tachycardia.

CONCLUSIONS

Every effort should be made to implement strategies conducive to more effective monitoring of the QT interval to prevent QT  nterval prolongation related complications in hospitalized patients.

摘要

目的

QT 间期延长可增加患者住院时间和死亡率。本研究旨在确定药物引起的 QT 间期延长的发生率,并确定哪种 QT 间期测量方法最适合心电图监测。

方法

对 2018 年期间在 Clínica Bíblica 医院住院的患者进行回顾性观察性研究。对住院时间超过 48 小时且药物治疗方案中至少包含一种可能延长 QT 间期的药物的患者的电子病历进行了审查。手动测量的 QT 间期使用 Fridericia 和 Rautaharju 公式进行校正,而自动测量的 QT 间期使用 Bazett 公式进行校正。使用 RISQ-PATH 量表评估风险。

结果

在分析的 141 例患者中,23 例根据其临床病史有心律失常,14 例在住院期间发生并发症。共有 113 例(80%)具有高 RISQ-PATH 评分,仅有 64 例在入院时接受了心电图检查。患者接受了平均三种潜在的 QT 间期延长药物。大多数自动测量的 QT 间期短于手动测量的 QT 间期。在所有校正中,Bazett 公式得到的 QTc 间期最长,而 Rautaharju 公式得到的 QTc 间期最短。没有患者发生 Tdp 或复杂室性心动过速。

结论

应尽一切努力实施有利于更有效地监测 QT 间期的策略,以预防住院患者的 QT 间期延长相关并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验