Suppr超能文献

老年胃癌患者全腹腔镜胃切除术与腹腔镜辅助胃切除术的短期疗效比较

Comparison of short-term efficacy between totally laparoscopic gastrectomy and laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy for elderly patients with gastric cancer.

作者信息

Zhao Rui-Yang, Li Hang-Hang, Zhang Ke-Cheng, Cui Hao, Deng Huan, Gao Jing-Wang, Wei Bo

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

Medical School of Chinese PLA, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Sep 27;14(9):950-962. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.950.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy (TLG) entails both gastrectomy and gastrointestinal reconstruction under laparoscopy. Compared with laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy (LAG), TLG has been demonstrated in many studies to require a smaller surgical incision, result in a faster postoperative recovery and less pain and have comparable long-term efficacy, which has been a research hotspot in recent years. Whether TLG is equally safe and feasible for elderly patients remains unclear.

AIM

To compare the short-term efficacy of and quality of life (QOL) associated with TLG and LAG in elderly gastric cancer (GC) patients.

METHODS

The clinicopathological data of 462 elderly patients aged ≥ 70 years who underwent LAG or TLG (including distal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy) between January 2017 and January 2022 at the Department of General Surgery, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital were retrospectively collected. A total of 232 patients were in the LAG group, and 230 patients were in the TLG group. Basic patient information, clinicopathological characteristics, operation information and QOL data were collected to compare efficacy.

RESULTS

Compared with those in the LAG group, intraoperative blood loss in the TLG group was significantly lower ( < 0.001), and the time to first flatus and postoperative hospitalization time were significantly shorter (both < 0.001). The overall incidence of postoperative complications in the TLG group was significantly lower than that in the LAG group ( = 0.01). Binary logistic regression results indicated that LAG and an operation time > 220 min were independent risk factors for postoperative complications in elderly patients with GC (P < 0.05). In terms of QOL, no statistically significant differences in various preoperative indicators were found between the LAG group and the LTG group ( > 0.05). Compared with the laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy group, patients who received totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy had lower nausea and vomiting scores and higher satisfaction with their body image ( < 0.05). Patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy were more satisfied with their body image than patients in the totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy group ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TLG is safe and feasible for elderly patients with GC and has outstanding advantages such as reducing intracorporeal blood loss, promoting postoperative recovery and improving QOL.

摘要

背景

全腹腔镜胃切除术(TLG)需要在腹腔镜下进行胃切除及胃肠道重建。与腹腔镜辅助胃切除术(LAG)相比,多项研究表明,TLG手术切口更小,术后恢复更快、疼痛更轻,且长期疗效相当,这使其成为近年来的研究热点。TLG对老年患者是否同样安全可行尚不清楚。

目的

比较TLG与LAG在老年胃癌(GC)患者中的短期疗效及生活质量(QOL)。

方法

回顾性收集2017年1月至2022年1月在中国人民解放军总医院第一医学中心普通外科接受LAG或TLG(包括远端胃切除术和全胃切除术)的462例年龄≥70岁老年患者的临床病理资料。LAG组232例,TLG组230例。收集患者基本信息、临床病理特征、手术信息及QOL数据以比较疗效。

结果

与LAG组相比,TLG组术中出血量显著更低(<0.001),首次排气时间及术后住院时间显著更短(均<0.001)。TLG组术后并发症总发生率显著低于LAG组(=0.01)。二元逻辑回归结果表明LAG及手术时间>220分钟是老年GC患者术后并发症的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。在QOL方面,LAG组与LTG组术前各项指标差异均无统计学意义(>0.05)。与腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术组相比,接受全腹腔镜全胃切除术的患者恶心呕吐评分更低,对身体形象的满意度更高(<0.05)。接受腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术的患者对身体形象的满意度高于全腹腔镜远端胃切除术组患者(<0.05)。

结论

TLG对老年GC患者安全可行,在减少体内失血、促进术后恢复及改善QOL等方面具有突出优势。

相似文献

2
Totally Laparoscopic Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Jun;31(6):676-691. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0566. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
4
Comparison of totally laparoscopic and laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug;47(8):2023-2030. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
6
Influence of liver function after laparoscopy-assisted totally laparoscopic gastrectomy.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 May 27;15(5):859-870. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i5.859.
7
[Comparison of short-term efficacy between robotic and 3D laparoscopic-assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer].
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):350-356. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200224-00085.
9
Comparison of totally robotic and totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4476-4484. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10924-6. Epub 2024 Jun 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Is surgery the best treatment for elderly gastric cancer patients?
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Nov 27;13(11):1351-1360. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1351.
2
Epidemiological Trends and Future Perspectives of Gastric Cancer in Eastern Asia.
Digestion. 2022;103(1):22-28. doi: 10.1159/000518483. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
5
Chinese and global burdens of gastric cancer from 1990 to 2019.
Cancer Med. 2021 May;10(10):3461-3473. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3892. Epub 2021 May 1.
6
Comparison of totally laparoscopic and laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug;47(8):2023-2030. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
8
9
Totally Laparoscopic Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Jun;31(6):676-691. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0566. Epub 2020 Sep 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验