Suppr超能文献

壶腹癌患者肝门部胆管侵犯的筛查

Screening for hilar biliary invasion in ampullary cancer patients.

作者信息

Takagi Tadayuki, Sugimoto Mitsuru, Suzuki Rei, Konno Naoki, Asama Hiroyuki, Sato Yuki, Irie Hiroki, Nakamura Jun, Takasumi Mika, Hashimoto Minami, Kato Tsunetaka, Kobashi Ryoichiro, Yanagita Takumi, Hashimoto Yuko, Marubashi Shigeru, Hikichi Takuto, Ohira Hiromasa

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.

Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Sep 16;14(9):536-546. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i9.536.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The treatment for ampullary cancer is pancreatoduodenectomy or local ampullectomy. However, effective methods for the preoperative investigation of hilar biliary invasion in ampullary cancer patients have not yet been identified.

AIM

To determine the necessity of and an appropriate method for investigating hilar biliary invasion of ampullary cancer.

METHODS

Among 43 ampullary cancer patients, 34 underwent endoscopic treatment ( = 9) or surgery ( = 25). The use of imaging findings (thickening and enhancement of the bile duct wall on contrast-enhanced computed tomography, irregularity on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, thickening of the entire bile duct wall on intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS), and partial thickening of the bile duct wall on IDUS) and biliary biopsy results for diagnosing hilar biliary invasion of ampullary cancer was compared.

RESULTS

Hilar invasion was not observed in every patient. Among the patients who did not undergo biliary stent insertion, the combination of partial thickening of the bile duct wall on IDUS and biliary biopsy results showed the highest accuracy (100%) for diagnosing hilar biliary invasion. However, each imaging method and biliary biopsy yielded some false-positive results.

CONCLUSION

Although some false-positive results were obtained with each method, the combination of partial thickening of the bile duct wall on IDUS and biliary biopsy results was useful for diagnosing hilar biliary invasion of ampullary cancer. However, hilar invasion of ampullary cancer is rare; therefore, the investigation of hilar biliary invasion of ampullary cancer might be unnecessary.

摘要

背景

壶腹癌的治疗方法是胰十二指肠切除术或局部壶腹切除术。然而,尚未确定用于术前评估壶腹癌患者肝门部胆管侵犯的有效方法。

目的

确定评估壶腹癌肝门部胆管侵犯的必要性及合适方法。

方法

43例壶腹癌患者中,34例接受了内镜治疗(n = 9)或手术(n = 25)。比较了使用影像学检查结果(对比增强计算机断层扫描上胆管壁增厚和强化、内镜逆行胆管造影上的不规则、导管内超声检查(IDUS)上整个胆管壁增厚以及IDUS上胆管壁局部增厚)和胆管活检结果来诊断壶腹癌肝门部胆管侵犯的情况。

结果

并非每个患者都观察到肝门部侵犯。在未进行胆管支架置入的患者中,IDUS上胆管壁局部增厚与胆管活检结果相结合对诊断肝门部胆管侵犯的准确性最高(100%)。然而,每种影像学检查方法和胆管活检都产生了一些假阳性结果。

结论

虽然每种方法都有一些假阳性结果,但IDUS上胆管壁局部增厚与胆管活检结果相结合对诊断壶腹癌肝门部胆管侵犯是有用的。然而,壶腹癌的肝门部侵犯很少见;因此,对壶腹癌肝门部胆管侵犯的评估可能没有必要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5039/9516475/5db018292e10/WJGE-14-536-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验