Institute of Sociology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Institute of Sociology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 5;17(10):e0274903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274903. eCollection 2022.
The question of how people change their opinions through social interactions has been on the agenda of social scientific research for many decades. Now that the Internet has led to an ever greater interconnectedness and new forms of exchange that seem to go hand in hand with increasing political polarization, it is once again gaining in relevance. Most recently, the field of opinion dynamics has been complemented by social feedback theory, which explains opinion polarization phenomena by means of a reinforcement learning mechanism. According to the assumptions, individuals not only evaluate the opinion alternatives available to them based on the social feedback received as a result of expressing an opinion within a certain social environment. Rather, they also internalize the expected and thus rewarded opinion to the point where it becomes their actual private opinion. In order to put the implications of social feedback theory to a test, we conducted a randomized controlled laboratory experiment. The study combined preceding and follow-up opinion measurements via online surveys with a laboratory treatment. Social feedback was found to have longer-term effects on private opinions, even when received in an anonymous and sanction free setting. Interestingly and contrary to our expectations, however, it was the mixture of supportive and rejective social feedback that resulted in the strongest influence. In addition, we observed a high degree of opinion volatility, highlighting the need for further research to help identify additional internal and external factors that might influence whether and how social feedback affects private opinions.
几十年来,人们如何通过社会互动改变观点的问题一直是社会科学研究的议题。如今,互联网的发展使人们之间的联系更加紧密,新的交流形式似乎与政治极化的加剧齐头并进,这个问题再次引起了人们的关注。最近,意见动态领域又补充了社会反馈理论,该理论通过强化学习机制来解释意见极化现象。根据假设,个人不仅会根据在特定社会环境中表达意见所收到的社会反馈来评估可获得的意见选择。相反,他们还会将预期的、因此受到奖励的意见内化,直到它成为他们实际的私人意见。为了检验社会反馈理论的含义,我们进行了一项随机对照实验室实验。该研究通过在线调查将先前和后续的意见测量与实验室处理相结合。研究发现,即使在匿名和无惩罚的环境中收到社会反馈,也会对私人意见产生长期影响。然而,有趣的是,与我们的预期相反,正是支持性和否定性社会反馈的混合对意见产生了最强的影响。此外,我们还观察到了高度的意见波动性,这凸显了需要进一步研究,以帮助确定可能影响社会反馈是否以及如何影响私人意见的其他内部和外部因素。