Suppr超能文献

替吉奥胶囊联合贝伐珠单抗作为三线治疗晚期或复发性结直肠癌的疗效观察:一项Ⅱ期、多中心临床试验(TAS-CC4 研究)。

Biweekly TAS-102 and bevacizumab as third-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer: a phase II, multicenter, clinical trial (TAS-CC4 study).

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec;27(12):1859-1866. doi: 10.1007/s10147-022-02243-4. Epub 2022 Oct 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

TAS-102 improves overall survival (OS) of patients with refractory colorectal cancer (CRC), resulting in median progression-free survival (PFS) of 2.0 months (RECOURSE trial). Subsequently, a combination of TAS-102 and bevacizumab was shown to extend median PFS by 3.7 months. However, approximately half of these patients experience grade 3/4 neutropenia. In this study, we evaluated whether biweekly TAS-102 and bevacizumab therapy has efficacy equal to that of conventional TAS-102 and bevacizumab therapy and whether it reduces adverse hematological effects.

METHODS

This phase II, investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study was conducted in Japan. Eligible patients had previously received first- and second-line chemotherapy for metastatic CRC. TAS-102 (35 mg/m) was given twice daily on days 1-5 and days 15-19 in a 4-week cycle, and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) was administered by intravenous infusion for 30 min every 2 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary end points were time-to-treatment failure (TTF), response rate (RR), OS, and safety.

RESULTS

44 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled in this study. Median PFS was 4.6 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.6-5.3) and median OS was 10.5 months (95% CI 9.6-11.4). A partial response was observed in 2 patients (4.5%, 95% CI 0.4-16.0%). The most common adverse event above grade 3 was neutropenia (7 patients, 15.9%, 95% CI 7.6-29.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Biweekly TAS-102 and bevacizumab therapy as third-line chemotherapy appears as effective as conventional TAS-102 and bevacizumab therapy, and this approach reduces adverse hematological effects.

摘要

背景

TAS-102 改善了难治性结直肠癌(CRC)患者的总生存期(OS),中位无进展生存期(PFS)为 2.0 个月(RECOURSE 试验)。随后,TAS-102 联合贝伐珠单抗的治疗方案将中位 PFS 延长了 3.7 个月。然而,大约一半的患者出现 3/4 级中性粒细胞减少症。在这项研究中,我们评估了双周 TAS-102 和贝伐珠单抗治疗方案是否与常规 TAS-102 和贝伐珠单抗治疗方案等效,以及是否可以减少不良的血液学效应。

方法

这是一项由研究者发起的、开放标签、单臂、多中心的 II 期临床试验,在日本进行。入组患者先前接受过转移性 CRC 的一线和二线化疗。TAS-102(35mg/m)每日两次,第 1-5 天和第 15-19 天给药,每 4 周为一个周期;贝伐珠单抗(5mg/kg)每 2 周静脉输注 30 分钟。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点包括治疗失败时间(TTF)、缓解率(RR)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。

结果

这项研究共入组了 44 例转移性结直肠癌患者。中位 PFS 为 4.6 个月(95%置信区间 [95%CI] 3.6-5.3),中位 OS 为 10.5 个月(95%CI 9.6-11.4)。2 例患者(4.5%,95%CI 0.4-16.0%)观察到部分缓解。最常见的 3 级以上不良事件为中性粒细胞减少症(7 例,15.9%,95%CI 7.6-29.7%)。

结论

作为三线化疗的双周 TAS-102 和贝伐珠单抗治疗方案与常规 TAS-102 和贝伐珠单抗治疗方案一样有效,并且这种方法减少了不良的血液学效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验