Mathenjwa Thulile, Nkosi Busi, Kim Hae-Young, Bain Luchuo Engelbert, Tanser Frank, Wassenaar Douglas
Dev World Bioeth. 2023 Dec;23(4):321-330. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12376. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
Smartphones with Global Positioning System (GPS) apps offer simple and accurate tools to collect data on human mobility. However, their associated ethical challenges remain to be assessed. We used the Emanuel framework to assess the ethical concerns of using smartphone GPS to record mobility patterns of young adults in rural South Africa for a larger study on mobility and HIV risk (Sesikhona). We conducted four focus groups (FGDs) with individuals eligible for the Sesikhona study. FGD data were coded using the Emanuel framework. Participants perceived use of smartphone GPS to study human mobility and HIV risk as valuable. They raised concerns about invasion of privacy and confidentiality. Also mentioned were risk/benefit ratio, informed consent and ongoing respect. Concerns expressed provided a useful evidence-base for the development of a guide to inform future participants about ethical issues arising in the use of GPS technology to track mobility and health-related issues.
具备全球定位系统(GPS)应用程序的智能手机提供了收集人类移动性数据的简单且准确的工具。然而,其相关的伦理挑战仍有待评估。我们使用伊曼纽尔框架来评估在一项关于移动性与艾滋病毒风险的更大规模研究(Sesikhona)中,使用智能手机GPS记录南非农村地区年轻人移动模式所涉及的伦理问题。我们与符合Sesikhona研究条件的个体进行了四次焦点小组讨论(FGD)。FGD数据使用伊曼纽尔框架进行编码。参与者认为使用智能手机GPS研究人类移动性和艾滋病毒风险是有价值的。他们对隐私和保密性的侵犯表示担忧。还提到了风险/收益比、知情同意和持续尊重。所表达的担忧为制定一份指南提供了有用的证据基础,该指南旨在让未来的参与者了解在使用GPS技术追踪移动性和健康相关问题时出现的伦理问题。