Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
CISAM Maternity Hospital, University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 7;17(10):e0272128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272128. eCollection 2022.
Since there are populational differences and risk factors that influence the cervical length, the aim of the study was to construct a populational curve with measurements of the uterine cervix of pregnant women in the second trimester of pregnancy and to evaluate which variables were related to cervical length (CL) ≤25 mm.
This was a multicenter cross-sectional study performed at 17 hospitals in several regions of Brazil. From 2015 to 2019, transvaginal ultrasound scan was performed in women with singleton pregnancies at 18 0/7 to 22 6/7 weeks of gestation to measure the CL. We analyzed CL regarding its distribution and the risk factors for CL ≤25 mm using logistic regression.
The percentage of CL ≤ 25mm was 6.67%. Shorter cervices, when measured using both straight and curve techniques, showed similar results: range 21.0-25.0 mm in straight versus 22.6-26.0 mm in curve measurement for the 5th percentile. However, the difference between the two techniques became more pronounced after the 75th percentile (range 41.0-42.0 mm straight x 43.6-45.0 mm in curve measurement). The risk factors identified for short cervix were low body mass index (BMI) (OR: 1.81 CI: 1.16-2.82), higher education (OR: 1.39 CI: 1.10-1.75) and personal history ([one prior miscarriage OR: 1.41 CI: 1.11-1.78 and ≥2 prior miscarriages OR: 1.67 CI: 1.24-2.25], preterm birth [OR: 1.70 CI: 1.12-2.59], previous low birth weight <2500 g [OR: 1.70 CI: 1.15-2.50], cervical surgery [OR: 4.33 CI: 2.58-7.27]). By contrast, obesity (OR: 0.64 CI: 0.51-0.82), living with a partner (OR: 0.76 CI: 0.61-0.95) and previous pregnancy (OR: 0.46 CI: 0.37-0.57) decreased the risk of short cervix.
The CL distribution showed a relatively low percentage of cervix ≤25 mm. There may be populational differences in the CL distribution and this as well as the risk factors for short CL need to be considered when adopting a screening strategy for short cervix.
由于存在影响宫颈长度的人群差异和危险因素,本研究旨在构建一个包含妊娠中期孕妇子宫颈测量值的人群曲线,并评估哪些变量与宫颈长度(CL)≤25mm 相关。
这是一项多中心、横断面研究,在巴西多个地区的 17 家医院进行。2015 年至 2019 年期间,对 18 0/7 至 22 6/7 孕周的单胎妊娠孕妇进行经阴道超声扫描,以测量 CL。我们使用逻辑回归分析 CL 与分布以及 CL≤25mm 的危险因素之间的关系。
CL≤25mm 的百分比为 6.67%。使用直线和曲线技术测量的短颈具有相似的结果:第 5 百分位数时,直线测量的范围为 21.0-25.0mm,而曲线测量的范围为 22.6-26.0mm。然而,两种技术之间的差异在第 75 百分位数后变得更加明显(直线测量范围为 41.0-42.0mm,曲线测量范围为 43.6-45.0mm)。短颈的危险因素包括低体重指数(BMI)(OR:1.81,95%CI:1.16-2.82)、较高的教育程度(OR:1.39,95%CI:1.10-1.75)和个人史[一次既往流产(OR:1.41,95%CI:1.11-1.78)和≥2 次既往流产(OR:1.67,95%CI:1.24-2.25]、早产(OR:1.70,95%CI:1.12-2.59)、既往低出生体重<2500g(OR:1.70,95%CI:1.15-2.50)、宫颈手术(OR:4.33,95%CI:2.58-7.27)。相反,肥胖(OR:0.64,95%CI:0.51-0.82)、与伴侣同居(OR:0.76,95%CI:0.61-0.95)和既往妊娠(OR:0.46,95%CI:0.37-0.57)降低了短颈的风险。
CL 分布显示宫颈长度≤25mm 的比例相对较低。CL 分布可能存在人群差异,在采用短颈筛查策略时需要考虑这一点以及短颈的危险因素。