Yang Y, Dong C, Sun C, Wang K, Zhang W, Zheng W P, Zhang F B, Qin H, Han C, Wang Z, Xu M, Gao W
Department of Pediatric Organ Transplantation,Organ Transplantation Center,Tianjin First Central Hospital,Key Laboratory of Transplantation,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Tianjin 300192,China.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 1;60(10):922-929. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20220412-00159.
To evaluate the effects of steatotic donor livers on the safety of donors and the prognosis of donors and recipients in pediatric living donor liver transplantation. A total of 814 pediatric living donor liver transplantations were performed between January 2013 and December 2020 at Department of Pediatric Organ Transplantation,Tianjin First Central Hospital.The clinical data were collected and a retrospective study was conducted.The recipients and the donors were divided into non-steatotic donor liver group(=733) and steatotic donor liver group(=81) according to whether the donor graft had steatosis. The recipients and the donors in the steatotic donor liver group were further divided into mild and moderate steatosis groups based on the degree of liver steatosis.Among the donors of non-steatosis donor group,there were 307 males and 426 females,with a median age of 30 years(range:18 to 57 years);the recipients included 351 males and 382 females,with a median age of 7 months(range:4 month to 14 years).Among the donors of steatosis donor group,there were 41 males and 40 females,with a median age of 31 years(range:22 to 51 years);the recipients included 34 males and 47 females,with a median age of 8 months(range:5 months to 11 years).The donors and the recipients were followed up regularly by means of outpatient reexamination and questionnaire survey after operation.Statistical analysis of data between groups was performed using -test,Wilcoxon rank-sum test,repeated measures ANOVA,χ test,or Fisher's exact test,respectively.The survival curves of recipients and grafts in different groups were created by Kaplan-Meier method,and the survival rates of the steatotic donor liver group and the non-steatotic donor liver group were compared by Log-rank method. There was no significant difference in the gender of donors in both groups (=0.132).There were significant differences in the age and blood type distribution as well as body weight and body mass index(all <0.05) between the two groups.No significant difference was seen in the recovery of liver function markers ALT and AST at 1,2,5 days and 1 month after operation (all >0.05) between the two groups.The steatotic donor liver group showed longer operation time ((294±75) minutes (264±81) minutes; =3.149,=0.002),increased incidence of postoperative biliary leakage (3.7%(3/81) 0.5% (4/733); =0.025) and delayed incision healing (7.4%(6/81) 2.0%(15/733); =0.013).There were no significant differences in gender,age,blood type distribution,height,weight and pediatric end-stage liver disease score of recipients between the two groups (all >0.05).As compared to the non-steatotic donor liver group,the steatotic donor liver group showed similar levels of ALT, AST and total bilirubin within 2 weeks after operation(all >0.05). The cumulative recipient survival rates in both groups were both 96.3%,the cumulative graft survival rates were 96.3% and 95.5%,respectively,without significant difference(both >0.05). No statistical difference was observed in the incidence of major complications between the two groups (all >0.05). There was no significant difference in the recovery of liver function markers of donors and recipients between mild and moderate steatosis groups(all >0.05).The cumulative recipient survival rates were both 95.9% and the cumulative graft survival rates were both 100% in mild and moderate steatosis groups,without significant difference(=0.592). The application of mild to moderate steatotic donor livers in pediatric living donor liver transplantation may prolong the operation time of donors,increase the incidence of complications such as biliary leakage and delayed incision healing. But there is no significant impact of mild to moderate steatotic donor livers on the overall postoperative recovery of donors and recipients,and the prognosis is ideal.
评估脂肪变性供肝对小儿活体肝移植供者安全性及供者和受者预后的影响。2013年1月至2020年12月,天津市第一中心医院小儿器官移植科共进行了814例小儿活体肝移植。收集临床资料并进行回顾性研究。根据供肝是否存在脂肪变性,将受者和供者分为非脂肪变性供肝组(n = 733)和脂肪变性供肝组(n = 81)。脂肪变性供肝组的受者和供者再根据肝脂肪变性程度进一步分为轻度和中度脂肪变性组。非脂肪变性供肝组的供者中,男性307例,女性426例,中位年龄30岁(范围:18至57岁);受者包括男性351例,女性382例,中位年龄7个月(范围:4个月至14岁)。脂肪变性供肝组的供者中,男性41例,女性40例,中位年龄31岁(范围:22至51岁);受者包括男性34例,女性47例,中位年龄8个月(范围:5个月至11岁)。术后通过门诊复查和问卷调查对供者和受者进行定期随访。组间数据的统计分析分别采用t检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验、重复测量方差分析、χ²检验或Fisher确切检验。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制不同组受者和移植物的生存曲线,采用Log-rank法比较脂肪变性供肝组和非脂肪变性供肝组的生存率。两组供者的性别差异无统计学意义(P = 0.132)。两组在年龄、血型分布以及体重和体重指数方面均存在显著差异(均P < 0.05)。两组术后1天、2天、5天和1个月时肝功能指标ALT和AST的恢复情况差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。脂肪变性供肝组手术时间更长((294±75)分钟对(264±81)分钟;t = 3.149,P = 0.002),术后胆漏发生率增加(3.7%(3/81)对0.5%(4/733);χ² = 0.025),切口愈合延迟(7.4%(6/81)对2.0%(15/733);χ² = 0.013)。两组受者的性别、年龄、血型分布、身高、体重和小儿终末期肝病评分差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。与非脂肪变性供肝组相比,脂肪变性供肝组术后2周内ALT、AST和总胆红素水平相似(均P > 0.05)。两组受者的累积生存率均为96.3%,移植物累积生存率分别为96.3%和95.5%,差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。两组主要并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。轻度和中度脂肪变性组供者和受者肝功能指标的恢复情况差异无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。轻度和中度脂肪变性组受者的累积生存率均为95.9%,移植物累积生存率均为100%,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.592)。在小儿活体肝移植中应用轻度至中度脂肪变性供肝可能会延长供者手术时间,增加胆漏和切口愈合延迟等并发症的发生率。但轻度至中度脂肪变性供肝对供者和受者术后总体恢复无显著影响,预后理想。