KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.
University of Antwerp, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, Antwerp, Belgium.
Phys Ther. 2022 Dec 6;102(12). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac137.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of fluoroscopy-guided manual lymph drainage (MLD) versus that of traditional and placebo MLD, when added to decongestive lymphatic therapy (DLT) for the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) (EFforT-BCRL trial), on the suprafascial accumulation of lymphatic fluid and skin elasticity.
In this multicenter, 3-arm, double-blind, randomized controlled trial (EFforT-BCRL trial), 194 participants (mean age = 61 [SD = 10] years) with unilateral BCRL were recruited. All participants received standardized DLT (education, skin care, compression therapy, exercises) and were randomized to fluoroscopy-guided, traditional, or placebo MLD. Participants received 60 min/d of treatment during the 3-week intensive phase and 18 sessions of 30 minutes during the 6-month maintenance phase. During this phase, participants were instructed to wear a compression garment, to perform exercises, and to perform a self-MLD procedure once daily. This study comprises secondary analyses of the EFforT-BCRL trial. Outcomes were the amount of fluid accumulation in the suprafascial tissues (local tissue water, extracellular fluid, and thickness of the skin and subcutaneous tissue) and skin elasticity at the level of the arm and trunk. Measurements were performed at baseline; after intensive treatment; after 1, 3, and 6 months of maintenance treatment; and after 6 months of follow-up.
At the level of the arm, there was a significant improvement over time in the 3 groups for most of the outcomes. At the level of the trunk, no remarkable improvement was noted within the individual groups. No significant interaction effects (between-group differences) were present. Only skin elasticity at the level of the arm, evaluated through palpation, showed a significant interaction effect.
All 3 groups showed similar improvements in response to DLT regardless of the type of MLD that was added. The effect of the addition of MLD to other components of DLT for reducing local tissue water and extracellular fluid or skin thickness and for improving skin elasticity and fibrosis in participants with chronic BCRL was limited.
Although MLD has been applied all over the world for many years, evidence regarding its added value in reducing arm volume in patients with BCRL is lacking. These results show that adding MLD to other components of DLT has limited value in reducing local tissue water and extracellular fluid or skin thickness and in improving skin elasticity and fibrosis in patients with chronic BCRL. To date, there is no clinical indication to continue including time-consuming MLD in physical therapist sessions for patients with chronic BCRL.
本研究旨在探讨在充血性淋巴水肿治疗(CDT)中加入透视引导下手动淋巴引流(MLD)与传统 MLD 和安慰剂 MLD 的效果,评估其对乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)的影响(EFforT-BCRL 试验),观察其对浅表组织液积聚和皮肤弹性的影响。
这是一项多中心、3 臂、双盲、随机对照试验(EFforT-BCRL 试验),共招募了 194 名单侧 BCRL 参与者(平均年龄 61 [SD=10] 岁)。所有参与者均接受标准化 CDT(教育、皮肤护理、压缩治疗、运动),并随机分为透视引导下 MLD、传统 MLD 和安慰剂 MLD 组。在 3 周的强化治疗阶段,参与者每天接受 60 分钟的治疗,在 6 个月的维持治疗阶段,参与者接受 18 次 30 分钟的治疗。在这个阶段,参与者被指示穿压缩服、进行运动,并每天进行一次自我 MLD 程序。本研究是 EFforT-BCRL 试验的二次分析。结果包括手臂和躯干水平的浅表组织液积聚量(局部组织水、细胞外液和皮肤及皮下组织厚度)和皮肤弹性。在基线时、强化治疗后、维持治疗 1、3 和 6 个月以及 6 个月随访时进行测量。
在手臂水平,3 组在大多数结果上均随着时间的推移而显著改善。在躯干水平,各组内均未出现明显改善。未观察到显著的组间交互作用(组间差异)。仅通过触诊评估的手臂皮肤弹性显示出显著的交互作用。
无论添加哪种类型的 MLD,所有 3 组对 DLT 的反应均表现出相似的改善。在减少局部组织水和细胞外液或皮肤厚度以及改善慢性 BCRL 患者皮肤弹性和纤维化方面,MLD 对 DLT 其他组成部分的添加效果有限。
尽管 MLD 已经在世界各地应用多年,但关于其在减少 BCRL 患者手臂体积方面的附加价值的证据仍然缺乏。这些结果表明,在减少慢性 BCRL 患者局部组织水和细胞外液或皮肤厚度以及改善皮肤弹性和纤维化方面,将 MLD 加入 DLT 的其他组成部分的价值有限。到目前为止,没有临床指征表明在慢性 BCRL 患者的物理治疗中继续包括耗时的 MLD。