Suppr超能文献

经腹联合经阴道彩色多普勒超声对前置血管和帆状胎盘脐带插入孕妇的诊断准确性。

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Transabdominal and Transvaginal Color Doppler Ultrasound for Pregnant Women with Vasa Previa and Velamentous Cord Insertion.

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, Jingzhou Hospital Affiliated to Yangtze University, China.

Radiology Department, Jingzhou Hospital Affiliated to Yangtze University, China.

出版信息

J Environ Public Health. 2022 Sep 29;2022:1685783. doi: 10.1155/2022/1685783. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate feasibility and accuracy of transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound (TA-CDUS) and transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound (TV-CDUS) as screening methods for pregnant women with vasa previa (VP) and velamentous cord insertion (VCI).

METHODS

A retrospective diagnostic accuracy study was performed on 5,434 pregnant women from 2018 to 2021, who underwent both TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS. Diagnostic performance of TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS was determined using specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR and LR), using the delivery information (gross examination) as the "Gold-standard". Patient records were reviewed for demographics and diagnosis.

RESULTS

The combination of VP and VCI was diagnosed in 37/5434 (0.68%) women at delivery. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall test accuracy of TA-CDUS were 72.97%, 99.85%, 77.14%, 99.81%, and 99.67%, respectively, for diagnosing VP with VCI. The corresponding values for TV-CDUS were 89.19%, 99.87%, 82.50%, 99.93%, and 99.80%, respectively. Moreover, the sensitivity of combination of TA-CDUS and TA-CDUS in determining VP with VCI was 97.30%, specificity 99.98%, PPV 97.30%, NPV 99.98%, and accuracy 99.96%. No significant difference in the misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis was found between the examination by TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS.

CONCLUSIONS

Both TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS can be acceptable diagnostic tools for assessment of pregnant women with VP and VCI, with a better application of TV-CDUS with higher accuracy. The combination of TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS could provide an objective imaging basis for choosing clinical treatment strategies and predicting prognosis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估经腹彩色多普勒超声(TA-CDUS)和经阴道彩色多普勒超声(TV-CDUS)作为前置血管(VP)和帆状脐带插入(VCI)孕妇筛查方法的可行性和准确性。

方法

对 2018 年至 2021 年间 5434 名接受 TA-CDUS 和 TV-CDUS 检查的孕妇进行了回顾性诊断准确性研究。采用特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、准确性以及阳性和阴性似然比(LR 和 LR)来确定 TA-CDUS 和 TV-CDUS 的诊断性能,以分娩信息(大体检查)为“金标准”。回顾患者记录以获取人口统计学和诊断信息。

结果

在分娩时,37/5434(0.68%)名女性被诊断为 VP 和 VCI 同时存在。TA-CDUS 诊断 VP 伴 VCI 的灵敏度、特异性、PPV、NPV 和总测试准确性分别为 72.97%、99.85%、77.14%、99.81%和 99.67%,TV-CDUS 相应值分别为 89.19%、99.87%、82.50%、99.93%和 99.80%。此外,TA-CDUS 和 TV-CDUS 联合检测确定 VP 伴 VCI 的灵敏度为 97.30%,特异性为 99.98%,PPV 为 97.30%,NPV 为 99.98%,准确性为 99.96%。TA-CDUS 和 TV-CDUS 检查在误诊和漏诊方面无显著差异。

结论

TA-CDUS 和 TV-CDUS 均可作为评估 VP 和 VCI 孕妇的可接受诊断工具,TV-CDUS 具有更高的准确性,应用效果更佳。TA-CDUS 和 TV-CDUS 的联合应用可为选择临床治疗策略和预测预后提供客观的影像学依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/763a/9536888/e436d5bea881/JEPH2022-1685783.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验