两种不同骨锚式助听器的比较。
Comparison of two different bone anchored hearing instruments.
作者信息
Kara Ahmet, Kalcioglu Mahmut Tayyar, Adigul Çağlayan, Topcu Merve Torun, Koçoğlu Mehmet, Celik Bilgehan, Yilmaz Mahmut Sinan
机构信息
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Korucuk, 54000, Sakarya, Turkey.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.
出版信息
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 May;280(5):2141-2147. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07675-2. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
PURPOSE
To compare the audiological performances of Turkey's most up-to-date bone conduction implant processors.
METHODS
Twenty-six bone-anchored hearing instrument users, thirteen in each group, were evaluated for speech understanding in quiet and several signal-to-noise ratios.
RESULTS
We noticed the differences at 0.5 and 1 kHz measurements in free field frequency specific test, aided SRT scores, non-adaptive and adaptive matrix test results for a few conditions created a statistically significant difference in favor of Baha-6.
CONCLUSIONS
Both processors offer positive gains to their users in noisy and silent conditions. However, the data showed statistically significant differences for some measurements that may be critical for patients in daily practice.
目的
比较土耳其最新款骨传导植入式处理器的听力学性能。
方法
对26名骨锚式助听器使用者进行评估，每组13人，评估其在安静环境下以及几种信噪比条件下的言语理解能力。
结果
在自由场频率特定测试中，我们注意到在0.5和1kHz测量时存在差异，助听听阈得分、非自适应和自适应矩阵测试结果在某些条件下产生了有利于Baha-6的统计学显著差异。
结论
两种处理器在嘈杂和安静环境下都能为使用者带来积极的增益。然而，数据显示在某些对患者日常实践可能至关重要的测量中存在统计学显著差异。
Zotero 插件