Suppr超能文献

基线患者报告症状对克罗恩病内镜缓解的预测性不如 MM-SES-CD。

Baseline Patient-reported Symptoms Less Predictive Than MM-SES-CD for Endoscopic Remission in Crohn's Disease.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 1;57(9):913-919. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001774.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This analysis evaluates the association between baseline patient-reported symptom (PRS) severity in Crohn's disease (CD), including abdominal pain, stool frequency, general well-being, and achievement of clinical and endoscopic outcomes. We compared baseline PRS to baseline endoscopic scores for the prediction of endoscopic remission (ER).

METHODS

This post hoc analysis of 2 clinical trials of infliximab in CD included 601 patients and evaluated baseline PRS variables (abdominal pain, stool frequency, and general well-being) as measured by the Crohn's disease activity index and their association with 6-month clinical remission (CR) (Crohn's Disease Activity Index<150), corticosteroid-free CR, and week 26/54 ER (absence of mucosal ulceration). Logistic regression models assessed the relationships between PRS and outcomes of interest. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses compared the sensitivity and specificity of the different baseline PRS compared with baseline endoscopic scores for achievement of ER at weeks 26 and 54.

RESULTS

No difference was found comparing patients with higher baseline PRS to those with lower PRS in achieving 6-month CR, 6-month corticosteroid-free CR, or week 26/54 ER. Modified multiplier of the SES-CD (MM-SES-CD) at baseline demonstrated a significant ability to predict week 54 ER (area under the curve, 0.71; 95% CI 0.65-0.78; P =0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline PRS in CD is not prognostic of clinical or endoscopic response. In contrast, active endoscopic disease as measured by the MM-SES-CD, more accurately predicts endoscopic outcomes. Endoscopic scores such as the MM-SES-CD may be considered for selection criteria and as a primary outcome of interest in CD trials, with PRS as a co-primary or secondary endpoint.

摘要

背景

本分析评估了克罗恩病(CD)患者基线期报告症状(PRS)严重程度与临床和内镜结局之间的关系,包括腹痛、粪便频率、一般健康状况和临床及内镜结局的实现。我们比较了基线 PRS 与基线内镜评分对内镜缓解(ER)的预测作用。

方法

这是对英夫利昔单抗治疗 CD 的 2 项临床试验的事后分析,纳入 601 例患者,评估了 PRS 变量(通过克罗恩病活动指数评估的腹痛、粪便频率和一般健康状况)与 6 个月临床缓解(CDAI<150)、无皮质类固醇的临床缓解和第 26/54 周 ER(无黏膜溃疡)的相关性。逻辑回归模型评估了 PRS 与感兴趣结局之间的关系。受试者工作特征曲线分析比较了不同基线 PRS 与基线内镜评分在第 26 和第 54 周实现 ER 的敏感性和特异性。

结果

在实现 6 个月 CR、6 个月无皮质类固醇 CR 或第 26/54 周 ER 方面,基线期 PRS 较高的患者与 PRS 较低的患者之间没有差异。基线期改良 SES-CD 的乘数(MM-SES-CD)显示出预测第 54 周 ER 的显著能力(曲线下面积,0.71;95%置信区间,0.65-0.78;P=0.017)。

结论

CD 的基线 PRS 不能预测临床或内镜反应。相比之下,用 MM-SES-CD 衡量的活动性内镜疾病更能准确预测内镜结局。MM-SES-CD 等内镜评分可作为 CD 试验的选择标准和主要研究终点,PRS 作为共同主要或次要终点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验