Syeda Moni, Bartholomew Jason, Santiago Shayane Valenzuela, Reeves Ashley J, Martonick Nickolai Jp, Cheatham Scott W, Baker Russell T
University of Idaho.
California State University Dominguez Hills.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Oct 1;17(6):1136-1143. doi: 10.26603/001c.38170. eCollection 2022.
Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) is a commonly utilized intervention for musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction. However, little is known regarding the reliability of forces applied by clinicians of different experience levels during an IASTM intervention.
The purpose of this pilot study was to assess intra-clinician reliability of IASTM force (i.e., mean normal force) during a simulated, one-handed stroke IASTM intervention across different levels of IASTM clinical experience.
Descriptive laboratory study.
The researchers conducted a repeated measures trial in a laboratory setting with a convenience sample of ten participants who had previously completed professional IASTM training. Participants performed 15 one-handed sweeping strokes with an IASTM instrument on a skin simulant attached to a force plate for a standardized hypothetical treatment scenario. The participants performed the treatment on two separate days, 24-48 hours apart. The researchers examined the intra-rater reliability for average (mean) normal forces using Bland-Altman (BA) plots and Coefficient of Variation (CV) values.
The BA plot results indicated all participants (professional athletic training students = 4, athletic trainers = 6; males = 5, females = 5; age = 32.60 ± 8.71 y; IASTM experience = 3.78 ± 4.10 y), except participant D (1.9N, 190g), were consistently reliable within 1N (100g) or less of force for mean differences and within the maximum limits of agreement around 3.7N (370g). Most participants' CV scores ranged between 8 to 20% supporting reliable force application within each treatment session.
The data indicated that IASTM trained clinicians could produce consistent forces within and across treatment sessions irrespective of clinical experience.
器械辅助软组织松动术(IASTM)是治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛和功能障碍常用的一种干预手段。然而,对于不同经验水平的临床医生在IASTM干预过程中施加力量的可靠性知之甚少。
本初步研究的目的是评估在模拟的单手划动IASTM干预过程中,不同IASTM临床经验水平下IASTM力量(即平均垂直力)在临床医生内部的可靠性。
描述性实验室研究。
研究人员在实验室环境中进行了一项重复测量试验,便利样本为10名之前完成过专业IASTM培训的参与者。在一个标准化的假设治疗场景中,参与者使用IASTM器械在连接到测力板的皮肤模拟物上进行15次单手划动。参与者在相隔24 - 48小时的两天内分别进行治疗。研究人员使用布兰德 - 奥特曼(BA)图和变异系数(CV)值来检验平均(均值)垂直力的评分者内部可靠性。
BA图结果表明,除参与者D(1.9N,190g)外,所有参与者(专业运动训练学生 = 4名,运动训练师 = 6名;男性 = 5名,女性 = 5名;年龄 = 32.60 ± 8.71岁;IASTM经验 = 3.78 ± 4.10年)在平均差异方面,力量在1N(100g)或更小范围内始终可靠,并且在约3.7N(370g)的一致性最大限值内。大多数参与者的CV分数在8%至20%之间,支持每次治疗过程中力量施加的可靠性。
数据表明,接受过IASTM培训的临床医生,无论临床经验如何,在治疗过程中以及不同治疗之间都能产生一致的力量。
3级。