Ekhator Chukwuyem, Nwankwo Ijeoma, Nicol Akito
Neuro-Oncology, New York Institute of Technology, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, USA.
Research, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Cureus. 2022 Oct 8;14(10):e30065. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30065. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Since its introduction in 1992, the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) criteria have been used in trauma to decide whether a patient requires radiographic imaging. The tool is important in reducing radiation exposure. However, applying the NEXUS criteria for cervical spine imaging in pediatric patients is poorly supported compared to their use in adults. The objective of this review was to examine the effectiveness of using the NEXUS criteria in the diagnostic management of pediatric cervical spine injuries (CSI). The following databases were searched for studies focused on applying the NEXUS criteria for CSI in pediatric patients: Cochrane, PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, ELSEVIER, and ScienceDirect. Additional studies were found through reference lists of primary sources and previous systematic and meta-analyses. The search focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, retrospective studies, prospective studies, and other uncontrolled trials published from 2000 to 2022. There were seven included studies with a total of 4502 pediatric patients. Five of the included studies were retrospective studies, while the remaining were prospective and case studies. Our results show that the sensitivity ranged from 43% to 100%, while the specificity ranged from 12.93% to 96%. The sensitivity increased with age, with those under the age of two or under the age of eight reporting poorer outcomes than the older pediatric patients. One study also shows that the proportion of patients undergoing cervical spine CT increased from 18% to 61% in the initial period before the implementation of clearance guidelines. The implementation of guidelines led to a 23% decrease in CT scans clearable by NEXUS criteria after 12 months. One of the studies reported that NEXUS criteria were a cost-effective option when used along with X-rays and CT. Overall, the studies do not strongly support the application of the NEXUS criteria to image pediatric patients for CSI. In conclusion, there is weak support in the literature for applying the NEXUS criteria in determining the need for cervical spine imaging in pediatric trauma patients. The practice and research implications of the findings are also discussed.
自1992年推出以来,国家急诊X线摄影应用研究(NEXUS)标准一直被用于创伤领域,以决定患者是否需要进行影像学检查。该工具对于减少辐射暴露很重要。然而,与在成人中使用相比,将NEXUS标准应用于儿科患者的颈椎成像缺乏有力支持。本综述的目的是检验使用NEXUS标准在儿科颈椎损伤(CSI)诊断管理中的有效性。我们检索了以下数据库,以查找专注于在儿科患者中应用NEXUS标准进行CSI诊断的研究:Cochrane、PubMed、谷歌学术、EMBASE、爱思唯尔和科学Direct。通过主要来源的参考文献列表以及先前的系统评价和荟萃分析找到了其他研究。检索重点是2000年至2022年发表的随机对照试验(RCT)、队列研究、回顾性研究、前瞻性研究和其他非对照试验。共有7项纳入研究,涉及4502名儿科患者。其中5项纳入研究为回顾性研究,其余为前瞻性研究和病例研究。我们的结果表明,敏感性范围为43%至100%,特异性范围为12.93%至96%。敏感性随年龄增长而增加,两岁以下或八岁以下的患者比年龄较大的儿科患者预后更差。一项研究还表明,在实施清除指南之前的初始阶段,接受颈椎CT检查的患者比例从18%增加到61%。指南实施12个月后,符合NEXUS标准可进行CT扫描的患者减少了23%。其中一项研究报告称,NEXUS标准与X射线和CT一起使用时是一种具有成本效益的选择。总体而言,这些研究并不强烈支持将NEXUS标准应用于儿科患者CSI的影像学检查。总之,文献中对于应用NEXUS标准来确定儿科创伤患者颈椎成像需求的支持力度较弱。本文还讨论了研究结果的实践和研究意义。