Suppr超能文献

难治性院外心脏骤停的初始心律与生存情况。布拉格院外心脏骤停随机试验的事后分析。

Initial rhythm and survival in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Post-hoc analysis of the Prague OHCA randomized trial.

作者信息

Havranek Stepan, Fingrova Zdenka, Rob Daniel, Smalcova Jana, Kavalkova Petra, Franek Ondrej, Smid Ondrej, Huptych Michal, Dusik Milan, Linhart Ales, Belohlavek Jan

机构信息

2(nd) Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.

2(nd) Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2022 Dec;181:289-296. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is generally poor. A recent Prague OHCA study has demonstrated that an invasive approach (including extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, ECPR) is a feasible and effective treatment strategy in refractory OHCA. Here we present a post-hoc analysis of the role of initial rhythm on patient outcomes.

METHODS

The study enrolled patients who had a witnessed OHCA of presumed cardiac cause without early recovery of spontaneous circulation. The initial rhythm was classified as either a shockable or a non-shockable rhythm. The primary outcome was a composite of 180 day-survival with Cerebral Performance in Category 1 or 2.

RESULTS

256 (median age 58y, 17% females) patients were enrolled. The median (IQR) duration of resuscitation was 52 (33-68) minutes. 156 (61%) and 100 (39%) of patients manifested a shockable and non-shockable rhythm, respectively. The primary outcome was achieved in 63 (40%) patients with a shockable rhythm and in 5 (5%) patients with a non-shockable rhythm (p < 0.001). When patients were analyzed separately based on whether the treatment was invasive (n = 124) or standard (n = 132), the difference in the primary endpoint between shockable and non-shockable initial rhythms remained significant (35/72 (49%) vs 4/52 (8%) in the invasive arm and 28/84 (33%) vs 1/48 (2%) in the standard arm; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

An initial shockable rhythm and treatment with an invasive approach is associated with a reasonable neurologically favorable survival for 180 days despite refractory OHCA. Non-shockable initial rhythms bear a poor prognosis in refractory OHCA even when ECPR is readily available.

摘要

背景

难治性院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的预后通常较差。最近的一项布拉格OHCA研究表明,侵入性治疗方法(包括体外心肺复苏,ECPR)是难治性OHCA的一种可行且有效的治疗策略。在此,我们对初始心律对患者预后的作用进行事后分析。

方法

该研究纳入了因心脏原因导致的目击OHCA且未早期恢复自主循环的患者。初始心律分为可电击心律或不可电击心律。主要结局是180天存活且脑功能分级为1级或2级的复合结局。

结果

共纳入256例患者(中位年龄58岁,17%为女性)。复苏的中位(IQR)持续时间为52(33 - 68)分钟。分别有156例(61%)和100例(39%)患者表现为可电击心律和不可电击心律。63例(40%)可电击心律患者和5例(5%)不可电击心律患者达到主要结局(p < 0.001)。当根据治疗是侵入性(n = 124)还是标准治疗(n = 132)对患者进行单独分析时,可电击和不可电击初始心律之间主要终点的差异仍然显著(侵入性治疗组为35/72(49%)对4/52(8%),标准治疗组为28/84(33%)对1/48(2%);p < 0.001)。

结论

尽管是难治性OHCA,但初始可电击心律和侵入性治疗方法与180天合理的神经功能良好存活相关。即使有ECPR可用,不可电击初始心律在难治性OHCA中预后也很差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验