Havranek Stepan, Fingrova Zdenka, Rob Daniel, Smalcova Jana, Kavalkova Petra, Franek Ondrej, Smid Ondrej, Huptych Michal, Dusik Milan, Linhart Ales, Belohlavek Jan
2(nd) Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.
2(nd) Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.
Resuscitation. 2022 Dec;181:289-296. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
The prognosis of refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is generally poor. A recent Prague OHCA study has demonstrated that an invasive approach (including extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, ECPR) is a feasible and effective treatment strategy in refractory OHCA. Here we present a post-hoc analysis of the role of initial rhythm on patient outcomes.
The study enrolled patients who had a witnessed OHCA of presumed cardiac cause without early recovery of spontaneous circulation. The initial rhythm was classified as either a shockable or a non-shockable rhythm. The primary outcome was a composite of 180 day-survival with Cerebral Performance in Category 1 or 2.
256 (median age 58y, 17% females) patients were enrolled. The median (IQR) duration of resuscitation was 52 (33-68) minutes. 156 (61%) and 100 (39%) of patients manifested a shockable and non-shockable rhythm, respectively. The primary outcome was achieved in 63 (40%) patients with a shockable rhythm and in 5 (5%) patients with a non-shockable rhythm (p < 0.001). When patients were analyzed separately based on whether the treatment was invasive (n = 124) or standard (n = 132), the difference in the primary endpoint between shockable and non-shockable initial rhythms remained significant (35/72 (49%) vs 4/52 (8%) in the invasive arm and 28/84 (33%) vs 1/48 (2%) in the standard arm; p < 0.001).
An initial shockable rhythm and treatment with an invasive approach is associated with a reasonable neurologically favorable survival for 180 days despite refractory OHCA. Non-shockable initial rhythms bear a poor prognosis in refractory OHCA even when ECPR is readily available.
难治性院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的预后通常较差。最近的一项布拉格OHCA研究表明,侵入性治疗方法(包括体外心肺复苏,ECPR)是难治性OHCA的一种可行且有效的治疗策略。在此,我们对初始心律对患者预后的作用进行事后分析。
该研究纳入了因心脏原因导致的目击OHCA且未早期恢复自主循环的患者。初始心律分为可电击心律或不可电击心律。主要结局是180天存活且脑功能分级为1级或2级的复合结局。
共纳入256例患者(中位年龄58岁,17%为女性)。复苏的中位(IQR)持续时间为52(33 - 68)分钟。分别有156例(61%)和100例(39%)患者表现为可电击心律和不可电击心律。63例(40%)可电击心律患者和5例(5%)不可电击心律患者达到主要结局(p < 0.001)。当根据治疗是侵入性(n = 124)还是标准治疗(n = 132)对患者进行单独分析时,可电击和不可电击初始心律之间主要终点的差异仍然显著(侵入性治疗组为35/72(49%)对4/52(8%),标准治疗组为28/84(33%)对1/48(2%);p < 0.001)。
尽管是难治性OHCA,但初始可电击心律和侵入性治疗方法与180天合理的神经功能良好存活相关。即使有ECPR可用,不可电击初始心律在难治性OHCA中预后也很差。