Suppr超能文献

通过优化作物模式实现地下水、粮食和经济权衡的水文经济模型框架。

Hydro-economic model framework for achieving groundwater, food, and economy trade-offs by optimizing crop patterns.

作者信息

Ma Qingtao, Yang Yonghui, Sheng Zhuping, Han Shumin, Yang Yanmin, Moiwo Juana Paul

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water Resources, Hebei Laboratory of Agricultural Water-saving, Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 286 Huaizhong Road, Shijiazhuang 050021, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water Resources, Hebei Laboratory of Agricultural Water-saving, Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 286 Huaizhong Road, Shijiazhuang 050021, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

出版信息

Water Res. 2022 Nov 1;226:119199. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.119199. Epub 2022 Oct 3.

Abstract

When allocating water resources, stakeholders (such as water departments, agricultural sector actors, and farmers) aim to maximize their benefits. This leads to conflicts between water savings, food security, and profit growth, causing major challenges for water managers. A hydro-economic model was developed to alleviate groundwater sustainability, food security, and economic growth (GFE) conflicts through crop pattern optimization. This model combines groundwater, agronomic, and economic sub-models to simulate spatiotemporal variations in groundwater level, irrigation requirement, crop production, and net profit. The NSGA-II algorithm was used to maximize net profits while minimizing groundwater extraction and food reduction through crop pattern optimization in irrigation areas and under crop production constraints. Then, using the Baoding Plain as the study area, three scenarios with no external water supply and nine scenarios with an external water supply of 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 km/y were designed. The present crop pattern caused a groundwater decline of 0.32 m/y and an overdraft of 0.61 km/y. The three scenarios without external water supply showed different options for maximizing net profit, minimizing groundwater extraction, and minimizing food reduction without affecting food production, food self-sufficiency or groundwater sustainability. All three scenarios cannot simultaneously satisfy the GFE target. With an external water supply of 0.3 km/y, only one scenario met the GFE target; with that of 0.6 km/y, all scenarios met the GFE target; and with that of 0.9 km/y, groundwater levels increased, profits overflowed, and food overproduction occurred.

摘要

在分配水资源时,利益相关者(如水务部门、农业部门参与者和农民)旨在实现自身利益最大化。这导致了节水、粮食安全和利润增长之间的冲突,给水管理人员带来了重大挑战。开发了一种水文经济模型,通过优化作物种植模式来缓解地下水可持续性、粮食安全和经济增长(GFE)之间的冲突。该模型结合了地下水、农艺和经济子模型,以模拟地下水位、灌溉需求、作物产量和净利润的时空变化。采用NSGA-II算法,在灌溉区作物生产约束条件下,通过优化作物种植模式,实现净利润最大化,同时减少地下水开采和粮食减产。然后,以保定平原为研究区域,设计了无外部供水的三种情景和外部供水量分别为0.3、0.6和0.9 km/y的九种情景。当前的作物种植模式导致地下水位每年下降0.32 m,超采量为0.61 km/y。三种无外部供水的情景显示了在不影响粮食生产、粮食自给自足或地下水可持续性的情况下,实现净利润最大化、地下水开采最小化和粮食减产最小化的不同方案。所有三种情景都无法同时满足GFE目标。当外部供水量为0.3 km/y时,只有一种情景达到了GFE目标;当供水量为0.6 km/y时,所有情景都达到了GFE目标;当供水量为0.9 km/y时,地下水位上升,利润过剩,粮食产量过剩。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验