Langenfeld Anke, Gassner Antonia Pia, Wirth Brigitte, Mühlemann Malin Beth, Nyirö Luana, Bastiaenen Caroline, Swanenburg Jaap
Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Integrative Spinal Research (ISR Group), Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, 6211 LK, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Arch Physiother. 2022 Oct 17;12(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40945-022-00149-y.
The need for an efficient and feasible strategy to deal with neck pain has a high priority for many countries. Validated assessment tools like the Neck Disability Index (NDI) to evaluate the functional status of a neck pain patient are urgently needed to treat and to follow-up patients purposefully. A German version (NDI-G) was shown to be valid and reliable, but has so far not been tested for responsiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the NDI-G`s responsiveness.
This was a prospective cohort study with a seven-week follow-up. Fifty chronic neck pain patients filled out NDI-G twice. Additionally, the Patients' Global Impression of Change score (PGIC) was assessed at follow-up. Wilcoxon and Spearman tests were used to assess direction and strength of the association between the change in NDI-G and PGIC. The receiver operating characteristics method and the area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to assess sensitivity and specificity of the NDI-G change over time.
The Wilcoxon test showed statistically significant differences for NDI-G at baseline and follow-up in the total sample, the "clinically improved" and "clinically not improved" subgroups as indicated in the PGIC. Spearman test resulted in a moderate correlation between the NDI-G and the PGIC (r = -0.53, p = 0.01) at follow-up. AUC showed an acceptable discrimination [AUC = 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.64 - 0.91)] of the NDI-G, with a cutoff score of 1.5, between clinically improved and clinically not improved patients, based on the PGIC.
The NDI-G is responsive to change in chronic neck pain. Together with the results of a previous study on its validity and reliability, the NDI-G can be recommended for research and clinical settings in patients with neck pain in German speaking countries.
NCT02676141. February 8, 2016.
对于许多国家而言,制定一种有效且可行的策略来应对颈部疼痛是当务之急。迫切需要像颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)这样经过验证的评估工具来评估颈部疼痛患者的功能状态,以便有针对性地治疗和随访患者。德语版的NDI(NDI-G)已被证明有效且可靠,但迄今为止尚未对其反应性进行测试。本研究的目的是评估NDI-G的反应性。
这是一项为期七周随访的前瞻性队列研究。50名慢性颈部疼痛患者两次填写NDI-G。此外,在随访时评估患者的整体变化印象评分(PGIC)。采用Wilcoxon和Spearman检验来评估NDI-G变化与PGIC之间关联的方向和强度。计算受试者工作特征方法和曲线下面积(AUC)以评估NDI-G随时间变化的敏感性和特异性。
Wilcoxon检验显示,在总样本、PGIC中显示的“临床改善”和“临床未改善”亚组中,NDI-G在基线和随访时存在统计学上的显著差异。Spearman检验结果显示,随访时NDI-G与PGIC之间存在中度相关性(r = -0.53,p = 0.01)。基于PGIC,AUC显示NDI-G在临床改善和临床未改善患者之间具有可接受的区分度[AUC = 0.78(95%置信区间0.64 - 0.91)],截断分数为1.5。
NDI-G对慢性颈部疼痛的变化有反应。结合先前关于其有效性和可靠性的研究结果,NDI-G可推荐用于德语国家颈部疼痛患者的研究和临床环境。
NCT02676141。2016年2月8日。