Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Science, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biological Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Jun 1;62(6):2203-2210. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac599.
Angiotensin II is implicated in GCA pathology. We examined whether the use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) is associated with GCA risk compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) or other antihypertensives.
We performed a matched cohort study including adults who were initiators of antihypertensives in UK primary care data between 1995 and 2019. Treatment-naïve individuals without prior GCA or PMR were categorized into three groups-ARB initiators, ACEi initiators, or other antihypertensive initiators (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics or alpha-adrenoceptor blockers)-and followed for up to 5 years. Incident GCA was defined using validated Read codes, with age of onset ≥50 years and two or more glucocorticoid prescriptions. Inverse probability-weighted Cox models were used to model outcome risk, adjusting for lifestyle parameters, comorbidities and comedications.
Among >1 million new starters of antihypertensives (81 780 ARBs, 422 940 ACEis and 873 066 other antihypertensives), the incidence rate of GCA per 10 000 patient-years was 2.73 (95% CI 2.12, 3.50) in the ARB group, 1.76 (95% CI 1.25, 2.39) in the ACEi group and 1.90 (95% CI 1.37, 2.56) in the other antihypertensives group. The hazard of GCA was higher in ARB initiators [hazard ratio (HR) 1.55; 95% CI 1.16, 2.06] than initiators of ACEis, but similar between initiators of other antihypertensives and ACEis (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.87, 1.35).
Initiation of ARBs is associated with a higher risk of GCA compared with ACEis or other antihypertensives. Mechanistic studies of angiotensin receptor biology will provide further clarity for our findings.
血管紧张素 II 参与了巨细胞动脉炎的发病机制。我们研究了与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)或其他降压药相比,血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)的使用是否与巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)风险相关。
我们进行了一项匹配队列研究,纳入了 1995 年至 2019 年期间英国初级保健数据中开始使用降压药的成年人。将无 GCA 或 PMR 病史且未接受过治疗的患者分为三组:ARB 起始治疗组、ACEi 起始治疗组和其他降压药起始治疗组(β受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂、利尿剂或α肾上腺素受体阻滞剂),并随访 5 年。使用经过验证的 Read 编码定义新发 GCA,发病年龄≥50 岁且有两种或以上糖皮质激素处方。使用逆概率加权 Cox 模型来对结局风险建模,调整生活方式参数、合并症和合并用药。
在超过 100 万例新开始使用降压药的患者中(ARB 组 81780 例、ACEi 组 422940 例和其他降压药组 873066 例),ARB 组的 GCA 发生率为每 10000 患者-年 2.73(95%CI,2.12 至 3.50),ACEi 组为 1.76(95%CI,1.25 至 2.39),其他降压药组为 1.90(95%CI,1.37 至 2.56)。与 ACEi 起始治疗者相比,ARB 起始治疗者的 GCA 发病风险更高(危险比[HR],1.55;95%CI,1.16 至 2.06),但与其他降压药起始治疗者相比,两者之间无显著差异(HR,1.08;95%CI,0.87 至 1.35)。
与 ACEi 或其他降压药相比,ARB 的起始治疗与 GCA 风险增加相关。对血管紧张素受体生物学的机制研究将为我们的发现提供进一步的明确性。