Suppr超能文献

跨界河流制度中的认知共同体:以湄公河委员会为例的干流水电开发研究。

Epistemic community in transboundary river regime: a case study in the Mekong River Commission regarding mainstream hydropower development.

机构信息

Center of Water Management and Climate Change, Institute of Environment and Natural Resources, Vietnam National University - Ho Chi Minh City, 01 Marie Curie Street, VNU campus, Quarter 6, Linh Trung Ward, Thu Duc Dist., Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Wageningen University and Research, 6708 PB, Wageningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2022 Oct 18;194(Suppl 2):771. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10176-8.

Abstract

Despite the importance of transboundary water management, cooperation mechanisms are limited, especially in the case of Mekong River basin where environmental and social aspects are threatened by recent anthropogenic pressures like hydropower development. Existing transboundary mechanism such as the Mekong River Commission (MRC) is challenged to facilitate the cooperation between riparian states. An epistemic community (EC) is considered to effectively influence international governance and is studied as part of transboundary river regimes. The existence of an MRC EC is part of that regime but understanding about its characteristics is yet limited. This research aims to fill in the gap by unraveling the main features of the EC in relation to hydropower development. We analyze shared causal beliefs and policy goals that developed in the EC framework of Haas applying literature review and semi-structured interviews of experts. Results show that the community experts share causal beliefs and policy goals only to a limited extent while disagreeing on many aspects. It resembles a "disciplined" or "professional" group rather than an EC. This suggests that the knowledge factor has not gained proper influence and attention in the region, resulting in incoherent policy advice leading to policymakers developing policies based on incomplete and fragmented knowledge. The role of the MRC in the decision-making process could become more relevant if it would facilitate the development of an EC. Bringing key stakeholders including policymakers and experts into a platform where policy goals and causal beliefs are facilitated to reach possible consensus is recommended. Narrowing the science-policy gap while acknowledging differences in interests and policy objectives is crucial to reach a sustainable transboundary management of the Mekong River given its rapid development, especially on hydropower.

摘要

尽管跨界水资源管理至关重要,但合作机制却很有限,特别是在湄公河流域,由于最近的人为压力,如水电开发,环境和社会方面受到威胁。现有的跨界机制,如湄公河委员会(MRC),在促进流域国家之间的合作方面面临挑战。知识共同体(EC)被认为可以有效地影响国际治理,并作为跨界河流制度的一部分进行研究。MRC EC 的存在是该制度的一部分,但对其特征的了解还很有限。本研究旨在通过揭示与水电开发相关的 EC 的主要特征来填补这一空白。我们应用文献综述和对专家的半结构化访谈,分析了在 Haas 的 EC 框架内形成的共同因果信念和政策目标。结果表明,共同体专家在有限的程度上共享因果信念和政策目标,但在许多方面存在分歧。这更像是一个“有纪律的”或“专业的”团体,而不是一个 EC。这表明,在该地区,知识因素并没有得到适当的影响和重视,导致政策建议不一致,决策者制定的政策基于不完整和零散的知识。如果 MRC 能够促进 EC 的发展,那么它在决策过程中的作用可能会变得更加重要。建议将包括政策制定者和专家在内的主要利益相关者纳入一个平台,促进政策目标和因果信念的达成,以达成可能的共识。在承认利益和政策目标差异的同时,缩小科学政策差距对于实现湄公河的可持续跨界管理至关重要,特别是在水电开发方面。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验