Suppr超能文献

跟腱修复中缝线类型和技术的比较:一项离体生物力学动物实验。

Comparison of Suture Types and Techniques in Achilles Tendon Repair: An Ex Vivo Biomechanical Animal Experiment.

机构信息

*Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University Medical Faculty, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.

†Clinical Orthopedics and Traumatology, Kayseri City Education and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey.

出版信息

J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2024 Mar-Apr;114(2). doi: 10.7547/21-136.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ideal suture technique and type in tendon repair remain unclear. This biomechanical study aimed to assess the biomechanical characteristics of three techniques-modified Kessler (mKE), modified Krackow (mKR), and modified tension Bunnell (mtBU)-in sheep Achilles tendon tear repair using three suture types-polypropylene, polyester, and ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE)-which are also compared.

METHODS

Sixty-three Achilles tendons harvested from sheep were transversely hacked as a replacement for rupture in a standardized measure and repaired using mKE, mKR, and mtBU techniques with No. 2 polypropylene, polyester, and UHMWPE sutures. Biomechanical parameters, such as Young's modulus, ultimate strength, and strength to the 5-mm gap, were recorded for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The mtBU technique with UHMWPE use resulted in increased ultimate strength, strength to 5-mm gap, Young's modulus, and quantity of specimens with low clinical failure modes compared with the other techniques with other suture materials. Furthermore, mtBU has the lowest thickness at the repair side of the tendons. This approach showed tendon failure during maximal traction testing, whereas the mKE and mKR techniques had polyethylene and polyester suture failures.

CONCLUSIONS

The UHMWPE suture was significantly superior to the other sutures in each technique in terms of strength and durability. The mtBU technique using UHMWPE suture showed better biomechanical results, implying that this repair might be more appropriate to obtain early mobilization after tendon ruptures.

摘要

背景

肌腱修复中理想的缝合技术和类型仍不清楚。本生物力学研究旨在评估三种技术(改良 Kessler 缝合术[mKE]、改良 Krackow 缝合术[mKR]和改良张力 Bunnell 缝合术[mTB])在使用三种缝线(聚丙烯、聚酯和超高分子量聚乙烯[UHMWPE])修复羊跟腱撕裂中的生物力学特性,同时也进行了比较。

方法

从羊身上采集了 63 根跟腱,在标准化测量中作为断裂的替代物进行横向砍断,并使用 mKE、mKR 和 mTB 技术,用 2 号聚丙烯、聚酯和 UHMWPE 缝线进行修复。记录了杨氏模量、极限强度和 5mm 间隙强度等生物力学参数,以便进行统计分析。

结果

与其他缝线材料相比,mTB 技术与 UHMWPE 联合使用可提高极限强度、5mm 间隙强度、杨氏模量以及低临床失效模式的标本数量。此外,mTB 在修复肌腱侧的厚度最小。这种方法在最大牵引测试中导致肌腱失效,而 mKE 和 mKR 技术则导致聚乙烯和聚酯缝线失效。

结论

在每种技术中,UHMWPE 缝线在强度和耐久性方面均明显优于其他缝线。使用 UHMWPE 缝线的 mTB 技术显示出更好的生物力学结果,这表明这种修复方法可能更适合在肌腱断裂后尽早进行活动。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验