Suppr超能文献

肾动脉支架置入术后肾皮质血流灌注与血压反应的相关性

Correlation of renal cortical blood perfusion and BP response after renal artery stenting.

作者信息

Wang Siyu, Zhang Sijie, Li Yan, Ma Na, Li Mengpu, Ai Hu, Zhu Hui, Ren Junhong, Li Yongjun, Li Peng

机构信息

Department of Sonography, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.

Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 3;9:939519. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.939519. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to observe the correlation between renal cortical blood perfusion (CBP) parameters and BP response in patients with severe renal artery stenosis (RAS) who underwent stenting.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. A total of 164 patients with unilateral severe RAS after successful percutaneous transluminal renal artery stenting in Beijing Hospital from October 2017 to December 2020 were included. According to the results of BP evaluated at 12 months, all patients were divided into the BP response group ( = 98) and BP nonresponse group ( = 66). The baseline clinical and imaging characteristics and follow-up data about 24 h ABPM and CBP were recorded and analyzed. Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between CBP parameters and 24 h average SBP. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for BP response.

RESULTS

Among 164 patients with severe RAS, there were 100 males (61.0%), aged 37-75 years, with an average of 56.8 ± 18.4 years, and average artery stenosis of 84.0 ± 12.5%. The BP nonresponse patients had a longer duration of hypertension, more current smoking subjects and diabetic patients, lower eGFR, increased number of hypertensive agents, and rate of insulin compared with the BP response group ( < 0.05). After PTRAS, patients in the BP response group were associated with significantly lower BP and improved CPB, characterized by increased levels of maximum intensity (IMAX), area under ascending curve (AUC1), area under the descending curve (AUC2), shortened rising time (RT), mean transit time (mTT), and prolonged time to peak intensity (TTP; < 0.05). However, the BP nonresponse group was only associated with significantly reduced RT ( < 0.05) compared with baseline data. During an average follow-up of 11.5 ± 1.7 months, the BP response group was associated with significantly lower levels of SBP, DBP, 24 h average SBP, and 24 h average DBP compared with the nonresponse group ( < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that the the pre-operative CBP parameters, including IMAX ( = 0.317), RT ( = 0.249), AUC1 ( = 0.614), AUC2 ( = 0.558), and postoperative CBP parameters, including RT ( = 0.283), AUC1 ( = 0.659), and AUC2 ( = 0.674) were significantly positively correlated with the 24 h average SBP, while the postoperative TTP ( = -0.413) and mTT ( = -0.472) were negatively correlated with 24 h average SBP ( < 0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis found that diabetes (OR = 1.294), NT-proBNP (OR = 1.395), number of antihypertensive agents (OR = 2.135), pre-operation IMAX (OR = 1.534), post-operation AUC2 (OR = 2.417), and baseline dDBP (OR = 2.038) were related factors for BP response (all < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients in the BP nonresponse group often have diabetes, a longer duration of hypertension, significantly reduced glomerular filtration rate, and heavier renal artery stenosis. CBP parameters are closely related to 24 h average SBP, and pre-operation IMAX and post-operation AUC2 are markers for a positive BP response.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在观察接受支架置入术的严重肾动脉狭窄(RAS)患者肾皮质血流灌注(CBP)参数与血压反应之间的相关性。

方法

这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究。纳入了2017年10月至2020年12月在北京医院成功进行经皮腔内肾动脉支架置入术后的164例单侧严重RAS患者。根据12个月时评估的血压结果,将所有患者分为血压反应组(n = 98)和血压无反应组(n = 66)。记录并分析基线临床和影像学特征以及24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)和CBP的随访数据。采用Pearson相关性分析评估CBP参数与24小时平均收缩压(SBP)之间的关系。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析评估血压反应的危险因素。

结果

164例严重RAS患者中,男性100例(61.0%),年龄37 - 75岁,平均年龄56.8±18.4岁,平均动脉狭窄84.0±12.5%。与血压反应组相比,血压无反应患者的高血压病程更长,当前吸烟者和糖尿病患者更多,估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)更低,高血压药物数量增加,胰岛素使用率更高(P < 0.05)。经皮腔内肾动脉支架置入术(PTRAS)后,血压反应组患者的血压显著降低,CBP改善,表现为最大强度(IMAX)、上升曲线下面积(AUC1)、下降曲线下面积(AUC2)水平升高,上升时间(RT)缩短,平均通过时间(mTT)缩短,达峰强度时间(TTP)延长(P < 0.05)。然而,与基线数据相比,血压无反应组仅RT显著降低(P < 0.05)。在平均11.5±1.7个月的随访期间,与无反应组相比,血压反应组的SBP、舒张压(DBP)、24小时平均SBP和24小时平均DBP水平显著更低(P < 0.05)。Pearson相关性分析显示,术前CBP参数,包括IMAX(r = 0.317)、RT(r = 0.249)、AUC1(r = 0.614)、AUC2(r = 0.558),以及术后CBP参数,包括RT(r = 0.283)、AUC1(r = 0.659)和AUC2(r = 0.674)与24小时平均SBP显著正相关,而术后TTP(r = -0.413)和mTT(r = -0.472)与24小时平均SBP负相关(P < 0.05)。多因素逻辑回归分析发现,糖尿病(OR = 1.294)、N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)(OR = 1.395)、降压药物数量(OR = 2.135)、术前IMAX(OR = 1.534)、术后AUC2(OR = 2.417)和基线舒张压差值(dDBP)(OR = 2.038)是血压反应的相关因素(均P < 0.05)。

结论

血压无反应组患者常患有糖尿病、高血压病程更长、肾小球滤过率显著降低且肾动脉狭窄更严重。CBP参数与24小时平均SBP密切相关,术前IMAX和术后AUC2是血压阳性反应的标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21c9/9573998/9863ce72aeec/fcvm-09-939519-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Correlation of renal cortical blood perfusion and BP response after renal artery stenting.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 3;9:939519. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.939519. eCollection 2022.
3
[Characteristics of renal cortical perfusion and its association with renal function among elderly patients with renal artery stenosis].
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 24;47(8):628-633. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2019.08.007.
5
Renal stenting for incidentally discovered renal artery stenosis: is there any outcome benefit?
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 Jul-Aug;22(4):525-33. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.12.022.
7
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with SonoVue could accurately assess the renal microvascular perfusion in diabetic kidney damage.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Jul;27(7):2891-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr789. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
8
Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Prognosis in Patients With Renal Artery Stenosis.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 11;9:783994. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.783994. eCollection 2022.
9
Renal function and outcome of PTRA and stenting for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis.
Kidney Int. 2003 Jan;63(1):276-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00734.x.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Renal artery stenosis.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Mar-Apr;65:60-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
[Standardized thought of examination and operation with contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of renal artery stenosis].
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 May 5;100(17):1281-1283. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200302-00561.
3
Clinical predictors of blood pressure response after renal artery stenting.
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;72(4):1269-1275. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.12.041. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
6
When and How Should We Revascularize Patients With Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis?
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 25;12(6):505-517. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.10.023.
8
Is there still a role for renal artery stenting in the management of renovascular hypertension - A single-center experience and where do we stand?
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Mar;20(3):202-206. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.008. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
9
Renal Artery Stenosis: When to Revascularize in 2017.
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2017 Apr;42(4):110-135. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
10
Renal Artery Stent Outcomes: Effect of Baseline Blood Pressure, Stenosis Severity, and Translesion Pressure Gradient.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 8;66(22):2487-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.073.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验