Suppr超能文献

鼻内镜下动力切割与低温等离子射频消融术治疗鼻腔鼻窦内翻性乳头状瘤:疗效及对免疫功能破坏作用的差异分析。

Dynamic Incision under Nasal Endoscope and Low-Temperature Plasma Radiofrequency Ablation for Nasal Inverted Papilloma: An Analysis of Differences in Efficacy and the Destructive Effect on Immune Function.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Nanjing Medical University Hospital Affiliated Suzhou & Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215000, China.

出版信息

Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Oct 9;2022:9618193. doi: 10.1155/2022/9618193. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

METHODS

NIP patients ( = 106) admitted between January 2020 and March 2021 were selected and grouped as follows according to the random number table method: a dissection group treated with dynamical-system surgery under nasal endoscope and an ablation group treated with LTPRA. The clinical curative effects of the two procedures were compared, and the related indexes (operation time (OT), intraoperative blood loss (IBL), and length of stay (LOS)) and postoperative adverse reactions (ARs) were counted. In addition, fasting venous blood samples were collected before treatment (T0), as well as 3 (T1) and 7 days after treatment (T2) to detect inflammatory factors (IFs; C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-)) and T lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+). Finally, all patients received a one-year follow-up to compare the differences in prognostic survival rate and disease recurrence rate between groups.

RESULTS

The ablation group has a similar LOS to the dissection group ( > 0.05), but lower OT and IBL. No marked difference was observed between groups in terms of the total effective rate ( > 0.05), but the adverse reaction rate was higher in the dissection group compared with the ablation group ( < 0.05). Compared with T0, elevated CRP, IL-6, TNF-, and CD3+ were observed in both cohorts at T1, with lower levels in the ablation group as compared to the dissection group, while CD4+ and CD8+ decreased in both cohorts and were higher in the ablation group ( < 0.05). Meanwhile, the levels of CRP, IL-6, TNF-, and CD3+ in both groups were lower at T2 compared to T1, whereas those of CD4+ and CD8+ in both groups were higher at T2 compared to T1 ( < 0.05). As indicated by the statistics on prognostic follow-up, the two cohorts of patients showed no evident difference in the 1-year survival rate and disease recurrence rate ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both dynamical-system surgery under nasal endoscope and LTPRA have good therapeutic effects on NIP, but the latter is safer and can effectively reduce the postoperative inflammatory reaction of patients and maintain the stability of immune function, which has higher clinical application value.

摘要

方法

选择 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月间收治的 NIP 患者(=106),采用随机数表法分组:经鼻内镜下动力系统手术治疗的解剖组和 LTPRA 治疗的消融组。比较两种手术的临床疗效,统计相关指标(手术时间(OT)、术中出血量(IBL)和住院时间(LOS))和术后不良反应(ARs)。另外,治疗前(T0)、治疗后 3 天(T1)和 7 天(T2)采集空腹静脉血样,检测炎症因子(IFs;C 反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和肿瘤坏死因子-(TNF-))和 T 淋巴细胞亚群(CD3+、CD4+和 CD8+)。最后,所有患者进行为期 1 年的随访,比较两组患者的预后生存率和疾病复发率。

结果

消融组的 LOS 与解剖组相似(>0.05),但 OT 和 IBL 较低。两组总有效率无明显差异(>0.05),但解剖组的不良反应发生率高于消融组(<0.05)。与 T0 相比,两组在 T1 时均出现 CRP、IL-6、TNF-和 CD3+升高,消融组低于解剖组,而两组的 CD4+和 CD8+均下降,消融组较高(<0.05)。同时,两组在 T2 时的 CRP、IL-6、TNF-和 CD3+水平均低于 T1,而两组的 CD4+和 CD8+水平均高于 T1(<0.05)。预后随访统计结果表明,两组患者的 1 年生存率和疾病复发率无明显差异(>0.05)。

结论

经鼻内镜下动力系统手术和 LTPRA 治疗 NIP 均有较好的疗效,但后者更安全,能有效降低患者术后炎症反应,维持免疫功能稳定,具有更高的临床应用价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ce/9573818/c17b8232f60c/CMMM2022-9618193.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验