Free University of Berlin, Institute of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Königin-Luise-Straße 2-4, 14195Berlin, Germany.
BASF SE, Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, Carl-Bosch-Straße 38, 67056Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
Chem Res Toxicol. 2022 Nov 21;35(11):1962-1973. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00128. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
Nominal concentrations () in cell culture media are routinely used to define concentration-effect relationships in the toxicology. The actual concentration in the medium () can be affected by adsorption processes, evaporation, or degradation of chemicals. Therefore, we measured the total and free concentration of 12 chemicals, covering a wide range of lipophilicity (log -0.07-6.84), in the culture medium () and cells () after incubation with Balb/c 3T3 cells for up to 48 h. Measured values were compared to predictions using an as yet unpublished mass balance model that combined relevant equations from similar models published by others. The total for all chemicals except tamoxifen (TAM) were similar to the . This was attributed to the cellular uptake of TAM and accumulation into lysosomes. The free (i.e., unbound) for the low/no protein binding chemicals were similar to the , whereas values of all moderately to highly protein-bound chemicals were less than 30% of the . Of the 12 chemicals, the two most hydrophilic chemicals, acetaminophen (APAP) and caffeine (CAF), were the only ones for which the was the same as the . The for all other chemicals tended to increase over time and were all 2- to 274-fold higher than . Measurements of , using a digitonin method to release cytosol, compared well with (using a freeze-thaw method) for four chemicals (CAF, APAP, FLU, and KET), indicating that both methods could be used. The mass balance model predicted the total within 30% of the measured values for 11 chemicals. The free of all 12 chemicals were predicted within 3-fold of the measured values. There was a poorer prediction of values, with a median overprediction of 3- to 4-fold. In conclusion, while the number of chemicals in the study is limited, it demonstrates the large differences between and total and free and , which were also relatively well predicted by the mass balance model.
细胞培养介质中的名义浓度()通常用于定义毒理学中的浓度-效应关系。介质中的实际浓度()可能会受到吸附过程、蒸发或化学物质降解的影响。因此,我们测量了在与 Balb/c 3T3 细胞孵育长达 48 小时后,培养基()和细胞()中 12 种化学物质的总浓度和游离浓度,这些化学物质的亲脂性范围很广(log -0.07-6.84)。测量值与使用尚未发表的质量平衡模型预测值进行了比较,该模型结合了其他作者发表的类似模型中的相关方程。除了他莫昔芬(TAM)之外,所有化学物质的总浓度与预测值相近。这归因于 TAM 的细胞摄取和积累到溶酶体中。对于低/无蛋白结合的化学物质,游离(即未结合)浓度与预测值相近,而所有中等至高度蛋白结合的化学物质的浓度均低于预测值的 30%。在这 12 种化学物质中,两种最亲水的化学物质,对乙酰氨基酚(APAP)和咖啡因(CAF),是唯一游离浓度与预测值相同的化学物质。所有其他化学物质的浓度随着时间的推移而增加,并且均高于预测值的 2-274 倍。使用二辛可宁法释放细胞质来测量,与使用冻融法测量的 4 种化学物质(CAF、APAP、FLU 和 KET)的 ()相比,结果非常吻合,这表明两种方法都可以使用。质量平衡模型预测了 11 种化学物质的总浓度,其测量值的偏差在 30%以内。所有 12 种化学物质的游离浓度都在测量值的 3 倍以内。模型对 浓度的预测结果较差,中位数的预测值偏高 3-4 倍。总之,尽管研究中的化学物质数量有限,但它表明 与总浓度和游离浓度之间存在很大差异,质量平衡模型也能较好地预测这些差异。