Suppr超能文献

精准肿瘤学试验的挑战、机遇与创新统计设计

Challenges, opportunities, and innovative statistical designs for precision oncology trials.

作者信息

Yin Jun, Shen Shihao, Shi Qian

机构信息

Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Dermbiont, Inc., Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2022 Sep;10(18):1038. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-356.

Abstract

In the era of precision oncology, improved understanding of tumor heterogeneity, particularly at the molecular level, has caused a shift from traditionally histology based cancer drug development to molecularly targeted drug development. The shift to the molecular view of cancer leads to increasingly small cancer populations for clinical trials which may be underpowered using traditional statistical designs. This paradigm shift lead to the recent developments of innovative clinical trial designs to address the challenges from precision oncology clinical trials. Hence, this paper reviewed and described innovative trial designs for precision oncology. Different strategies were discussed to account patient and treatment effect heterogeneity, including precision dose-finding designs that tailor the optimal dose to different patients at different time points, master protocol designs that match patients' molecular alterations with specific targeted agents, and adaptive enrichment designs that dynamically modify eligibility criteria and enroll patients that are most likely to benefit from the novel agents. Despite their superior performance, better understanding of practical barriers is needed to widen their implementation for precision oncology trials. Therefore, this paper also reviewed the practical challenges regarding the implementation of precision oncology clinical trials, along with the strength and weakness of various approaches of precision oncology clinical trial designs.

摘要

在精准肿瘤学时代,对肿瘤异质性(尤其是分子水平的异质性)的深入理解,使得癌症药物研发从传统的基于组织学的模式转向分子靶向药物研发。向癌症分子视角的转变导致用于临床试验的癌症群体越来越小,使用传统统计设计可能无法提供足够的效力。这种范式转变促使了创新临床试验设计的最新发展,以应对精准肿瘤学临床试验带来的挑战。因此,本文回顾并描述了精准肿瘤学的创新试验设计。讨论了不同的策略以应对患者和治疗效果的异质性,包括在不同时间点为不同患者量身定制最佳剂量的精准剂量探索设计、将患者的分子改变与特定靶向药物相匹配的主方案设计,以及动态修改入选标准并招募最有可能从新型药物中获益的患者的适应性富集设计。尽管它们具有卓越的性能,但仍需要更好地理解实际障碍,以扩大其在精准肿瘤学试验中的应用。因此,本文还回顾了精准肿瘤学临床试验实施方面的实际挑战,以及精准肿瘤学临床试验设计各种方法的优缺点。

相似文献

1
Challenges, opportunities, and innovative statistical designs for precision oncology trials.
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Sep;10(18):1038. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-356.
4
New clinical trial design in precision medicine: discovery, development and direction.
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024 Mar 4;9(1):57. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01760-0.
5
Innovative trial design in precision oncology.
Semin Cancer Biol. 2022 Sep;84:284-292. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
6
An overview of precision oncology basket and umbrella trials for clinicians.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Mar;70(2):125-137. doi: 10.3322/caac.21600. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
7
Novel Study Designs in Precision Medicine - Basket, Umbrella and Platform Trials.
Curr Rev Clin Exp Pharmacol. 2022;17(2):114-121. doi: 10.2174/1574884716666210316114157.
8
Light and shadow on innovative clinical trial designs: reflections from the EORTC-PAMM course on 'preclinical and early-phase clinical pharmacology'.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Nov;12(11):1033-1036. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2019.1683446. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
9
Clinical trial design in the era of precision medicine.
Genome Med. 2022 Aug 31;14(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13073-022-01102-1.
10
Modified study designs to expand treatment options in personalised oncology: a multistakeholder view.
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Nov;194:113278. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113278. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical trials in otology and neurotology: state of the science.
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 24;16:1598789. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1598789. eCollection 2025.
3
A Strategy Utilizing Protein-Protein Interaction Hubs for the Treatment of Cancer Diseases.
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Nov 8;24(22):16098. doi: 10.3390/ijms242216098.

本文引用的文献

3
RAMPART: A model for a regulatory-ready academic-led phase III trial in the adjuvant renal cell carcinoma setting.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Sep;108:106481. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106481. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
4
phase1RMD: An R package for repeated measures dose-finding designs with novel toxicity and efficacy endpoints.
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0256391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256391. eCollection 2021.
5
A new basket trial design based on clustering of homogeneous subpopulations.
J Biopharm Stat. 2021 Jul 4;31(4):425-447. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2021.1897993. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
6
Moving Beyond 3+3: The Future of Clinical Trial Design.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2021 Jun;41:e133-e144. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_319783.
7
Hierarchical Bayesian clustering design of multiple biomarker subgroups (HCOMBS).
Stat Med. 2021 May 30;40(12):2893-2921. doi: 10.1002/sim.8946. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
8
Specifying the True- and False-Positive Rates in Basket Trials.
JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Nov 3;1. doi: 10.1200/PO.17.00181. eCollection 2017.
9
The Evolution of Master Protocol Clinical Trial Designs: A Systematic Literature Review.
Clin Ther. 2020 Jul;42(7):1330-1360. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
10
Larotrectinib in patients with TRK fusion-positive solid tumours: a pooled analysis of three phase 1/2 clinical trials.
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Apr;21(4):531-540. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30856-3. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验