• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

背景音乐的熟悉程度调节“鸡尾酒会”情境下对目标语音的皮层追踪。

Familiarity of Background Music Modulates the Cortical Tracking of Target Speech at the "Cocktail Party".

作者信息

Brown Jane A, Bidelman Gavin M

机构信息

School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.

Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 29;12(10):1320. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12101320.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci12101320
PMID:36291252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9599198/
Abstract

The "cocktail party" problem-how a listener perceives speech in noisy environments-is typically studied using speech (multi-talker babble) or noise maskers. However, realistic cocktail party scenarios often include background music (e.g., coffee shops, concerts). Studies investigating music's effects on concurrent speech perception have predominantly used highly controlled synthetic music or shaped noise, which do not reflect naturalistic listening environments. Behaviorally, familiar background music and songs with vocals/lyrics inhibit concurrent speech recognition. Here, we investigated the neural bases of these effects. While recording multichannel EEG, participants listened to an audiobook while popular songs (or silence) played in the background at a 0 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Songs were either familiar or unfamiliar to listeners and featured either vocals or isolated instrumentals from the original audio recordings. Comprehension questions probed task engagement. We used temporal response functions (TRFs) to isolate cortical tracking to the target speech envelope and analyzed neural responses around 100 ms (i.e., auditory N1 wave). We found that speech comprehension was, expectedly, impaired during background music compared to silence. Target speech tracking was further hindered by the presence of vocals. When masked by familiar music, response latencies to speech were less susceptible to informational masking, suggesting concurrent neural tracking of speech was easier during music known to the listener. These differential effects of music familiarity were further exacerbated in listeners with less musical ability. Our neuroimaging results and their dependence on listening skills are consistent with early attentional-gain mechanisms where familiar music is easier to tune out (listeners already know the song's expectancies) and thus can allocate fewer attentional resources to the background music to better monitor concurrent speech material.

摘要

“鸡尾酒会”问题——即听众如何在嘈杂环境中感知语音——通常使用语音(多说话者嘈杂声)或噪声掩蔽器进行研究。然而,现实的鸡尾酒会场景通常包括背景音乐(如咖啡店、音乐会)。调查音乐对同时进行的语音感知影响的研究主要使用高度受控的合成音乐或成形噪声,这些并不能反映自然的聆听环境。从行为学角度来看,熟悉的背景音乐以及带有歌声/歌词的歌曲会抑制同时进行的语音识别。在此,我们研究了这些影响的神经基础。在记录多通道脑电图时,参与者收听有声读物,同时以0分贝的信噪比在背景中播放流行歌曲(或静音)。歌曲对听众来说要么熟悉要么陌生,并且要么是原始录音中的歌声,要么是单独的乐器演奏。理解问题用于探测任务参与度。我们使用时间响应函数(TRF)来分离对目标语音包络的皮层跟踪,并分析100毫秒左右(即听觉N1波)的神经反应。我们发现,与静音相比,背景音乐期间的语音理解能力如预期那样受到损害。歌声的存在进一步阻碍了对目标语音的跟踪。当被熟悉的音乐掩蔽时,对语音的反应潜伏期对信息掩蔽的敏感度较低,这表明在听众熟悉的音乐期间,对语音的同时神经跟踪更容易。音乐熟悉度的这些差异效应在音乐能力较低的听众中进一步加剧。我们的神经成像结果及其对聆听技能的依赖性与早期的注意力增益机制一致,即熟悉的音乐更容易被排除(听众已经知道歌曲的预期),因此可以将更少的注意力资源分配给背景音乐,以便更好地监测同时出现的语音材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3d/9599198/bc3a90ddc52e/brainsci-12-01320-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3d/9599198/17c16d9bba7f/brainsci-12-01320-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3d/9599198/65c60f150cdd/brainsci-12-01320-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3d/9599198/f79d5d4bb3ac/brainsci-12-01320-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3d/9599198/c76f11be0371/brainsci-12-01320-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3d/9599198/bc3a90ddc52e/brainsci-12-01320-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3d/9599198/17c16d9bba7f/brainsci-12-01320-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3d/9599198/65c60f150cdd/brainsci-12-01320-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3d/9599198/f79d5d4bb3ac/brainsci-12-01320-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3d/9599198/c76f11be0371/brainsci-12-01320-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3d/9599198/bc3a90ddc52e/brainsci-12-01320-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Familiarity of Background Music Modulates the Cortical Tracking of Target Speech at the "Cocktail Party".背景音乐的熟悉程度调节“鸡尾酒会”情境下对目标语音的皮层追踪。
Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 29;12(10):1320. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12101320.
2
Attention, Musicality, and Familiarity Shape Cortical Speech Tracking at the Musical Cocktail Party.注意力、音乐性和熟悉度塑造了音乐鸡尾酒会上的皮层语音追踪。
bioRxiv. 2023 Oct 28:2023.10.28.562773. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.28.562773.
3
Song Properties and Familiarity Affect Speech Recognition in Musical Noise.歌曲属性和熟悉度对音乐噪声中的语音识别有影响。
Psychomusicology. 2022 Mar-Jun;32(1-2):1-6. doi: 10.1037/pmu0000284. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
4
Acceptable Noise Levels and Preferred Signal-to-noise Ratios for Speech and Music.可接受的噪声水平和语音及音乐的理想信噪比。
Ear Hear. 2022 May/Jun;43(3):1013-1022. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001157.
5
Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?方向性声音处理和听者动机对连续噪声语音的 EEG 反应的影响:正常听力和助听听力障碍者是否不同?
Hear Res. 2019 Jun;377:260-270. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
6
Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.信息掩蔽对刺激起始和声学变化的神经编码的影响。
Ear Hear. 2019 Jan/Feb;40(1):156-167. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000604.
7
Selective attention modulates neural envelope tracking of informationally masked speech in healthy older adults.选择性注意调节健康老年成年人信息掩蔽言语的神经包络追踪。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Jul;42(10):3042-3057. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25415. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
8
Attentional modulation and domain-specificity underlying the neural organization of auditory categorical perception.听觉范畴知觉神经组织背后的注意调制与领域特异性
Eur J Neurosci. 2017 Mar;45(5):690-699. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13526. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
9
Musical Experience Offsets Age-Related Decline in Understanding Speech-in-Noise: Type of Training Does Not Matter, Working Memory Is the Key.音乐体验可弥补年龄相关的言语理解能力在噪声环境下的下降:训练类型并不重要,工作记忆才是关键。
Ear Hear. 2021 Mar/Apr;42(2):258-270. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000921.
10
Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.双耳时间精细结构和包络线索在鸡尾酒会式聆听中的作用。
J Neurosci. 2016 Aug 3;36(31):8250-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4421-15.2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Familiar Music Reduces Mind Wandering and Boosts Behavioral Performance During Lexical Semantic Processing.熟悉的音乐可减少词汇语义处理过程中的走神现象并提高行为表现。
Brain Sci. 2025 May 2;15(5):482. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15050482.
2
Attention, musicality, and familiarity shape cortical speech tracking at the musical cocktail party.注意力、音乐性和熟悉度塑造了音乐“鸡尾酒会”上的皮层语音追踪。
Brain Lang. 2025 Jul;266:105581. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2025.105581. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
3
Hearing in categories and speech perception at the "cocktail party".

本文引用的文献

1
Song Properties and Familiarity Affect Speech Recognition in Musical Noise.歌曲属性和熟悉度对音乐噪声中的语音识别有影响。
Psychomusicology. 2022 Mar-Jun;32(1-2):1-6. doi: 10.1037/pmu0000284. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
2
Algorithms for Estimating Time-Locked Neural Response Components in Cortical Processing of Continuous Speech.用于估计连续语音皮质处理中时间锁定神经反应成分的算法。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2023 Jan;70(1):88-96. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2022.3185005. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
3
Prediction of Speech Intelligibility by Means of EEG Responses to Sentences in Noise.
“鸡尾酒会”情境下的分类听觉与言语感知
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 30;20(1):e0318600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318600. eCollection 2025.
4
Hearing in categories aids speech streaming at the "cocktail party".分类听觉有助于在“鸡尾酒会”场景下的语音流处理。
bioRxiv. 2024 Apr 5:2024.04.03.587795. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.03.587795.
5
The Effect of Musical Environments on Designers' Attention: Persistent Music Listening Interferes with Attention.音乐环境对设计师注意力的影响:持续听音乐会干扰注意力。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Mar 6;14(3):216. doi: 10.3390/bs14030216.
6
Short- and long-term neuroplasticity interact during the perceptual learning of concurrent speech.在同时学习语音的过程中,短期和长期神经可塑性相互作用。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Jan 31;34(2). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad543.
7
Attention, Musicality, and Familiarity Shape Cortical Speech Tracking at the Musical Cocktail Party.注意力、音乐性和熟悉度塑造了音乐鸡尾酒会上的皮层语音追踪。
bioRxiv. 2023 Oct 28:2023.10.28.562773. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.28.562773.
通过对噪声中句子的脑电图反应预测言语可懂度
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jun 1;16:876421. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.876421. eCollection 2022.
4
Speech-in-noise perception in musicians and non-musicians: A multi-level meta-analysis.音乐人和非音乐人士在噪声环境下的言语感知:一项多层次的荟萃分析。
Hear Res. 2022 Mar 15;416:108442. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108442. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
5
Linear Modeling of Neurophysiological Responses to Speech and Other Continuous Stimuli: Methodological Considerations for Applied Research.对语音和其他连续刺激的神经生理反应的线性建模:应用研究的方法学考量
Front Neurosci. 2021 Nov 22;15:705621. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.705621. eCollection 2021.
6
"Lass frooby noo!" the interference of song lyrics and meaning on speech intelligibility.“Lass frooby noo!”歌词和意义对言语可懂度的干扰。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2022 Sep;28(3):576-588. doi: 10.1037/xap0000368. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
7
The effects of background music on neural responses during reading comprehension.背景音乐对阅读理解过程中神经反应的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 29;10(1):18651. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75623-3.
8
Musicians Show Improved Speech Segregation in Competitive, Multi-Talker Cocktail Party Scenarios.音乐家在竞争性多说话者鸡尾酒会场景中表现出更好的语音分离能力。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 18;11:1927. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01927. eCollection 2020.
9
Attentional networks functioning and vigilance in expert musicians and non-musicians.专家音乐家和非音乐家的注意网络功能和警戒性。
Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):1121-1135. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01323-2. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
10
Auditory categorical processing for speech is modulated by inherent musical listening skills.听觉范畴处理言语受到固有音乐聆听技能的调节。
Neuroreport. 2020 Jan 27;31(2):162-166. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000001369.