Sayyed Adaah A, Abu El Hawa Areeg A, Huffman Samuel S, Deldar Romina, Bekeny Jenna C, Attinger Christopher E, Fan Kenneth L, Evans Karen K
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C.
Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Oct 24;10(10):e4546. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004546. eCollection 2022 Oct.
While the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is the most commonly employed thigh-based flap for microvascular reconstruction, its counterpart, the anteromedial thigh (AMT) flap, is a useful but underdescribed alternative when ALT perforators are absent or lacking. This review aims to assess the existing literature describing the anatomy and vascular territories supplying the AMT flap.
A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were queried for records pertaining to the study question using Medical Subject Heading terms such as "anteromedial thigh flap" and "free tissue transfer." Study characteristics and anatomic descriptors (including number and type of perforators, origin, and pedicle course supplying the AMT flap) were collected.
A total of 21 studies representing 723 AMT flaps were identified and included for analysis. Dominant perforators supplying the AMT flap most commonly included the descending lateral circumflex femoral artery (dLCFA; 35%) or the medial branch of the dLCFA (mdLCFA; 33.6%). Average pedicle length ranged from 7.5 to 10.6cm. The majority of AMT perforators were septocutaneous (n = 852, 63.8%) compared with musculocutaneous (n = 483, 36.2%). Perforators to the AMT were absent in 7.6 to 9.1% of clinical cases.
The variable vascular anatomy of the AMT flap has prevented its widespread adoption in reconstruction. As knowledge regarding pertinent perforator anatomy of the AMT flap increases, so may its utility as an alternative to the ALT flap. This review summarizes the spectrum of anatomy of the AMT vasculature described in the literature to date.
虽然股前外侧(ALT)皮瓣是用于微血管重建最常用的基于大腿的皮瓣,但其对应物股前内侧(AMT)皮瓣,在ALT穿支不存在或不足时是一种有用但描述不足的替代方案。本综述旨在评估描述AMT皮瓣的解剖结构和供血血管区域的现有文献。
根据PRISMA指南进行系统综述。使用医学主题词如“股前内侧皮瓣”和“游离组织移植”在Ovid MEDLINE、Embase和科学网中查询与研究问题相关的记录。收集研究特征和解剖描述符(包括供应AMT皮瓣的穿支数量和类型、起源和蒂的走行)。
共确定并纳入21项研究,涉及723个AMT皮瓣进行分析。供应AMT皮瓣的主要穿支最常见的是旋股外侧动脉降支(dLCFA;35%)或dLCFA的内侧支(mdLCFA;33.6%)。平均蒂长为7.5至10.6厘米。与肌皮穿支(n = 483,36.2%)相比,大多数AMT穿支为隔皮穿支(n = 852,63.8%)。在7.6%至9.1%的临床病例中,AMT没有穿支。
AMT皮瓣血管解剖结构的多变性阻碍了其在重建中的广泛应用。随着对AMT皮瓣相关穿支解剖知识的增加,其作为ALT皮瓣替代方案的效用也可能增加。本综述总结了迄今为止文献中描述的AMT脉管系统的解剖范围。