Matrone Fabio, Donofrio Alessandra, Fanetti Giuseppe, Revelant Alberto, Polesel Jerry, Chiovati Paola, Bortolus Roberto
Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Neoplasma. 2022 Dec;69(6):1425-1436. doi: 10.4149/neo_2022_220825N864. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
Hypofractionation in salvage radiotherapy (HSRT) for biochemical recurrence of prostatic cancer after prostatectomy is a debated issue and at present, it should be considered purely investigational because of the lack of evidence supporting its use. In this study, we report the outcomes of patients presenting with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy who received HSRT. The additional aim of this study is to compare two moderately HSRT schedules. Patients treated to prostate bed with daily Image Guided-VMAT and a total dose of 65 Gy/26 fractions (Group A) or 66 Gy/30 fractions (Group B) were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were: pN0/pNx, pre-HSRT PSA ≥0.2 ng/ml and ≤1 ng/ml, no evidence of pelvic/extrapelvic disease at restaging, no pelvic irradiation or dose boost on macroscopic local recurrence, no neoadjuvant/concomitant Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT), follow-up ≥36 months, and available pre/post HSRT data. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities, early and late, were assessed using CTCAE Vers. 5.0. One hundred patients were retrospectively identified to 50 in each group. Median follow-up was 59 months. All patients completed the prescribed HSRT. 5-year biochemical failure-free survival, local control, distant relapse-free survival, and ADT- free survival were 52.1%, 85.9%, 63.7%, and 73.2%, respectively. No significant differences in these outcomes were found between the two groups. On multivariate analysis, a hypofractionation schedule was not associated with any outcome, but ISUP score ≥ 4 and pre-HSRT PSA were associated with worse biochemical failure-free survival while only ISUP score ≥ 4 was associated with worse distant relapse-free survival. No Grade 3 GU/GI acute event was reported; 6 (6%) and 2 (2%) patients experienced late Grade ≥ 2 GU and GI events, respectively. No difference was found between the two groups neither in acute nor in late GU/GI toxicities. Our findings demonstrate that HSRT is feasible, effective, and safe. Our analysis did not show any significant difference between the two hypofractionated schedules. Further studies and randomized controlled trials are required in order to confirm these results and to identify the optimal hypofractionated schedule in the salvage setting.
前列腺切除术后前列腺癌生化复发的挽救性放疗(HSRT)中的大分割放疗是一个存在争议的问题,目前,由于缺乏支持其使用的证据,应仅将其视为研究性治疗。在本研究中,我们报告了接受HSRT的前列腺癌根治术后出现生化复发患者的治疗结果。本研究的另一个目的是比较两种中等程度的HSRT方案。研究纳入了接受每日影像引导容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)治疗前列腺床、总剂量为65 Gy分26次(A组)或66 Gy分30次(B组)的患者。纳入标准为:pN0/pNx,HSRT前前列腺特异抗原(PSA)≥0.2 ng/ml且≤1 ng/ml,再分期时无盆腔/盆腔外疾病证据,宏观局部复发时无盆腔照射或剂量增加,无新辅助/同步雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT),随访≥36个月,以及有HSRT前后可用数据。使用美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)第5.0版评估泌尿生殖系统(GU)和胃肠道(GI)的早期和晚期毒性。回顾性确定了100例患者,每组50例。中位随访时间为59个月。所有患者均完成了规定的HSRT。5年无生化失败生存率、局部控制率、无远处复发生存率和无ADT生存率分别为52.1%、85.9%、63.7%和73.2%。两组在这些结果上未发现显著差异。多因素分析显示,大分割放疗方案与任何结局均无关联,但国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)评分≥4和HSRT前PSA与较差的无生化失败生存率相关,而只有ISUP评分≥4与较差的无远处复发生存率相关。未报告3级GU/GI急性事件;分别有6例(6%)和2例(2%)患者发生晚期≥2级GU和GI事件。两组在急性和晚期GU/GI毒性方面均未发现差异。我们的研究结果表明,HSRT是可行、有效且安全的。我们的分析未显示两种大分割放疗方案之间存在任何显著差异。需要进一步的研究和随机对照试验来证实这些结果,并确定挽救性放疗中最佳的大分割放疗方案。