Ward Haven, Hosseini Omid, Taylor Brianna R, Opoku Kwame, Dharmarpandi Jankikeerthika, Dharmarpandi Gnanashree, Obokhare Izi
School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA.
School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, USA.
Cureus. 2022 Sep 23;14(9):e29484. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29484. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Background and objective Colectomies are common general surgical procedures performed for a variety of gastrointestinal disorders ranging from benign to malignant. Early definitive fascial closure has been shown to improve outcomes in patients following abdominal surgery. Conventional loop sutures and their accompanying knots present several disadvantages and require technical expertise. Reducing complications has been a strong driver for innovations such as the use of barbed sutures. Barbed sutures consist of axially spaced barbed segments on each side of a midpoint at which the barbs change directions. This study is a retrospective case-matched review that evaluates the effects of barbed sutures compared to non-barbed sutures on the rates and severity of postoperative complications following colectomies for abdominal fascial closure. Materials and methods The study enrolled 151 patients who underwent open and minimally invasive colorectal abdominal surgeries from January 1, 2017, to November 30, 2019. Primary outcome measures included operative time, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications compared between barbed and non-barded suture types. The sub-analysis further compared the surgical approach (open vs. robotic/laparoscopic) and incision type (Pfannenstiel vs. midline and other) between the suture types. Results The mean operative time for barbed sutures was 177 minutes, while it was 157 minutes for non-barbed sutures, resulting in a significant difference (p=0.0264). No significant difference was noted in postoperative complications between the groups. Conclusions The results of this study indicate that the use of barbed sutures in colorectal surgery does not increase the chances of postoperative infections, prolonged hospital stays, or other postoperative complications. Barbed sutures resulted in fewer class IV complications and more class I complications when compared to non-barbed sutures. Barbed sutures have proven to be beneficial in cases that require good wound approximation in high-tension areas and they eliminate the need for knots.
背景与目的 结肠切除术是常见的普通外科手术,用于治疗从良性到恶性的各种胃肠道疾病。早期确定性筋膜闭合已被证明可改善腹部手术后患者的预后。传统的环形缝线及其附带的结存在几个缺点,并且需要技术专长。减少并发症一直是诸如使用倒刺缝线等创新的强大驱动力。倒刺缝线在中点两侧各有轴向间隔的倒刺段,在该中点处倒刺方向改变。本研究是一项回顾性病例匹配研究,评估倒刺缝线与非倒刺缝线相比,在结肠切除术后腹部筋膜闭合的术后并发症发生率和严重程度方面的效果。
材料与方法 该研究纳入了2017年1月1日至2019年11月30日期间接受开放和微创结直肠腹部手术的151例患者。主要结局指标包括手术时间、住院时间以及倒刺和非倒刺缝线类型之间的术后并发症比较。亚分析进一步比较了缝线类型之间的手术方式(开放与机器人/腹腔镜)和切口类型(Pfannenstiel切口与中线及其他切口)。
结果 倒刺缝线的平均手术时间为177分钟,而非倒刺缝线为157分钟,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.0264)。两组术后并发症无显著差异。
结论 本研究结果表明,在结直肠手术中使用倒刺缝线不会增加术后感染、延长住院时间或其他术后并发症的几率。与非倒刺缝线相比,倒刺缝线导致的IV级并发症更少,I级并发症更多。倒刺缝线已被证明在需要在高张力区域实现良好伤口对合的情况下有益,并且无需打结。