Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Leiden University, The Netherlands.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2024 Oct;68(13-14):1323-1341. doi: 10.1177/0306624X221132229. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
Procedural justice literature proposes that when individuals perceive their treatment by criminal justice authorities as more procedurally just, they will be more likely to view those authorities as legitimate and, in turn, show more compliant behavior. Knowledge on potential determinants of procedural justice is, therefore, crucial. Research suggests that prior perceptions of procedural justice may influence later judgements of procedural justice. The current study used data from the Prison Project, including information on detainees' perceptions of their treatment by the police, the judge, the prison staff, the probation officer, and the lawyer. The findings show that detainees perceive the treatment by the lawyer as most procedurally just, while they evaluate the treatment by the police as least procedurally just. Further, how detainees experience the procedurally just treatment by the police is associated with how they feel treated by other authorities at a later stage in the criminal justice system.
程序正义文献提出,当个人认为自己受到刑事司法当局的待遇更加程序公正时,他们更有可能认为这些当局是合法的,进而表现出更多的服从行为。因此,了解程序正义的潜在决定因素至关重要。研究表明,先前对程序正义的看法可能会影响后来对程序正义的判断。本研究使用了监狱项目的数据,包括被拘留者对警察、法官、监狱工作人员、缓刑官和律师对待他们的看法的信息。研究结果表明,被拘留者认为律师的待遇最具程序公正性,而他们认为警察的待遇最不具有程序公正性。此外,被拘留者如何体验警察的程序公正待遇与他们在刑事司法系统的后期如何看待其他当局的待遇有关。