Suppr超能文献

对1型糖尿病老年及高危患者临床连续血糖监测目标的评估

An Assessment of Clinical Continuous Glucose Monitoring Targets for Older and High-Risk People Living with Type 1 Diabetes.

作者信息

O'Neal David N, Cohen Ohad, Vogrin Sara, Vigersky Robert A, Jenkins Alicia J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.

Department of Endocrinology, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Feb;25(2):108-115. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0350. Epub 2022 Dec 13.

Abstract

To assess relationships between continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) time in range (TIR), 70-180 mg/dL, time below range (TBR), <70 mg/dL, time above range (TAR), >180 mg/dL, and glucose coefficient of variation (CV) in relation to currently recommended clinical CGM targets for older people, which recommend reduced TIR and TBR targets relative to the general type 1 diabetes population. We conducted a post hoc analysis using the JDRF Australia Adult Hybrid Closed Loop trial database examining correlations in 120 adults with type 1 diabetes of 3 weeks masked CGM (Guardian Sensor 3; Medtronic) metrics ( = 61 on multiple daily injections, 59 on non-CGM augmented pumps) using manual insulin dosing at baseline and at 26-weeks, with 50% randomized to automated insulin dosing (AID). Correlations between baseline TIR and TAR were strong ( = -0.966;  < 0.0001), weak for TBR ( = 0.363;  < 0.0001), and glucose CV ( = 0.037;  = 0.687) while moderate between CV and TBR ( = 0.726;  < 0.0001). Associations were similar for participants aged >60 years ( = 15) versus younger subjects. Correlations of changes in (Δ) TIR with ΔTAR over 26 weeks were strong ( = -0.945;  < 0.001) and correlations for ΔTBR were weak ( = 0.025;  = 0.802). ΔCV did not significantly correlate with ΔTAR ( = -0.064;  = 0.526) but did with ΔTBR ( = 0.770;  = <0.001). Changes in TIR are not associated with changes in TBR. Thus, we recommend that for older AID users whilst TBR targets should be prioritized to reduce hypoglycemia-related risk, TBR should be addressed independently of TIR. Clinical Trial Registratrion number: (ACTRN12617000520336).

摘要

为评估持续葡萄糖监测(CGM)处于目标范围内的时间(TIR),即70 - 180mg/dL,低于目标范围的时间(TBR),即<70mg/dL,高于目标范围的时间(TAR),即>180mg/dL,以及葡萄糖变异系数(CV)与目前针对老年人推荐的临床CGM目标之间的关系,该目标相对于一般1型糖尿病患者群体而言,推荐降低TIR和TBR目标。我们使用JDRF澳大利亚成人混合闭环试验数据库进行了一项事后分析,研究120名1型糖尿病成人患者在3周的隐蔽CGM(Guardian Sensor 3;美敦力)指标(基线和26周时使用手动胰岛素给药,其中61名使用多次每日注射,59名使用非CGM增强型泵)之间的相关性,50%的患者随机分配至自动胰岛素给药(AID)组。基线时TIR与TAR之间的相关性很强(r = -0.966;P < 0.0001),TBR的相关性较弱(r = 0.363;P < 0.0001),葡萄糖CV的相关性较弱(r = 0.037;P = 0.687),而CV与TBR之间的相关性为中等(r = 0.726;P < 0.0001)。60岁以上参与者(n = 15)与年轻受试者的关联相似。26周内TIR变化(ΔTIR)与ΔTAR的相关性很强(r = -0.945;P < 0.001),ΔTBR的相关性较弱(r = 0.025;P = 0.802)。ΔCV与ΔTAR无显著相关性(r = -0.064;P = 0.526),但与ΔTBR有相关性(r = 0.770;P = <0.001)。TIR的变化与TBR的变化无关。因此,我们建议对于老年AID使用者,虽然应优先考虑TBR目标以降低低血糖相关风险,但TBR应独立于TIR进行处理。临床试验注册号:(ACTRN12617000520336)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验