Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1094, 0317 Oslo, Norway.
Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1094, 0317 Oslo, Norway.
J Psychosom Res. 2022 Dec;163:111063. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.111063. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
Cognitive difficulties are among the most disruptive and disabling problems reported by chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) sufferers. Acute Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is a trigger of chronic fatigue (CF) and CFS. The aim of this study was to investigate subjectively reported and objectively measured cognitive functioning in fatigued and non-fatigued adolescents six months after EBV infection.
A total of 195 adolescents (12-19 years) with acute EBV infection were followed prospectively for six months, after which they were grouped as chronically fatigued (CF) and non-fatigued (CF) cases based on questionnaire score; the CF-group was further subgrouped according to CFS diagnosis. A group of 70 healthy controls was also included. Groups were cross-sectionally compared on objective measures of processing speed, executive functions and memory, and subjective cognitive functioning.
There were no group differences regarding objective cognitive measures, but the CF-group reported significantly (p < 0.001) more cognitive problems (cognitive symptoms sum score = 9.5) compared to the CF-group (cognitive symptoms sum score = 5.3) and the healthy control group (cognitive symptoms sum score = 6.4). The CFS subgroup rated symptoms scores even higher but did not differ on cognitive performance tests.
Subjective experiences of cognitive difficulties characterize adolescents with CF and CFS six months after acute EBV infection, whereas objective measures of cognitive impairment are inconspicuous.
认知困难是慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)患者报告的最具破坏性和致残性问题之一。急性 Epstein-Barr 病毒(EBV)感染是慢性疲劳(CF)和 CFS 的触发因素。本研究旨在调查 EBV 感染后六个月疲劳和非疲劳青少年的主观报告和客观测量的认知功能。
共有 195 名急性 EBV 感染的青少年(12-19 岁)前瞻性随访六个月,之后根据问卷评分将其分为慢性疲劳(CF)和非疲劳(CF)组;CF 组根据 CFS 诊断进一步分为亚组。还包括 70 名健康对照组。各组在处理速度、执行功能和记忆的客观测量以及主观认知功能方面进行了横断面比较。
各组之间的客观认知测量没有差异,但 CF 组报告的认知问题明显更多(认知症状总分=9.5),与 CF 组(认知症状总分=5.3)和健康对照组(认知症状总分=6.4)相比。CFS 亚组的症状评分甚至更高,但认知表现测试没有差异。
急性 EBV 感染后六个月,CF 和 CFS 青少年的主观认知困难体验明显,而认知损害的客观测量则不明显。