Suppr超能文献

接受以手术为基础治疗与以放疗为基础治疗的下咽癌患者具有不同的失败模式。

Distinct Failure Patterns in Hypopharyngeal Cancer Patients Receiving Surgery-Based Versus Radiation-Based Treatment.

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, 70456, Taiwan.

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Feb;30(2):1169-1181. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12744-1. Epub 2022 Nov 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To cure advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC), primary operation followed by adjuvant (chemo-)radiotherapy (OP-CRT) or definitive chemoradiation (CCRT) are the two primary options. This study aimed to compare the failure patterns and long-term survival outcomes of HPSCC patients treated with these two strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2007 to 2015, 198 pathologically confirmed HPSCC patients receiving either OP-CRT or CCRT were retrospectively reviewed. Failure patterns and survival outcomes stratified by the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system and treatment modalities were compared.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-nine patients (95.4%) were stage III/IV and 62 patients (31.3%) received OP-CRT. Median follow-up duration was 4.9 years. Compared with CCRT, OP-CRT provided better 3-year local relapse-free survival for T3 (93 vs 48%, p < 0.0001), T4a (88 vs 37%, p = 0.0005) and better 3-year regional relapse-free survival for N2b+2c (93 vs 60%, p < 0.0001). Of note, for stage IVA subjects, OP-CRT provided better 3-year loco-regional relapse-free survival (85 vs 37%, p < 0.0001), marginal poor 3-year distant metastasis-free survival (62 vs 79%, p = 0.06), but comparable 3-year OS (52 vs 44%, p = 0.37) and 5-year OS (44 vs 31%, p = 0.15) compared with CCRT.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with advanced HPSCC, although OP-CRT and CCRT provided similar overall survival, failure patterns were distinct. OP-CRT provided better loco-regional control but was more likely to encounter distant metastases than CCRT. The detailed analysis of failure patterns will pave the way to improve this devastating disease.

摘要

背景

为了治愈晚期下咽鳞状细胞癌(HPSCC),主要治疗方案包括原发手术联合辅助(放)化疗(OP-CRT)或根治性放化疗(CCRT)。本研究旨在比较两种治疗方案治疗 HPSCC 患者的失败模式和长期生存结果。

方法

回顾性分析 2007 年至 2015 年间 198 例经病理证实的 HPSCC 患者,这些患者分别接受了 OP-CRT 或 CCRT。比较了按照第 7 版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统和治疗方式分层的失败模式和生存结果。

结果

189 例(95.4%)患者为 III/IV 期,62 例(31.3%)患者接受了 OP-CRT。中位随访时间为 4.9 年。与 CCRT 相比,OP-CRT 为 T3(93% vs. 48%,p<0.0001)和 T4a(88% vs. 37%,p=0.0005)患者提供了更好的 3 年局部无复发生存率,为 N2b+2c 患者提供了更好的 3 年区域无复发生存率(93% vs. 60%,p<0.0001)。值得注意的是,对于 IVA 期患者,OP-CRT 为患者提供了更好的 3 年局部区域无复发生存率(85% vs. 37%,p<0.0001),但远处无转移生存率略差(62% vs. 79%,p=0.06),3 年总生存率(52% vs. 44%,p=0.37)和 5 年总生存率(44% vs. 31%,p=0.15)与 CCRT 相似。

结论

对于晚期 HPSCC 患者,虽然 OP-CRT 和 CCRT 的总生存率相似,但失败模式不同。OP-CRT 提供了更好的局部区域控制,但比 CCRT 更有可能发生远处转移。对失败模式的详细分析将为改善这种毁灭性疾病铺平道路。

相似文献

5
To do or not to do: salvage management for hypopharyngeal cancer after chemoradiation therapy.做还是不做:放化疗后下咽癌的挽救治疗
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Aug;275(8):2119-2126. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5042-0. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
7
Pre- versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.局部晚期食管鳞癌的术前与术后放化疗。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Aug;154(2):732-740.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.038. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

7
Hypopharyngeal carcinoma: Do you know your guidelines?下咽癌:您了解下咽癌的诊疗指南吗?
Head Neck. 2019 Mar;41(3):569-576. doi: 10.1002/hed.24752. Epub 2018 Dec 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验