US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Botswana (CDC Botswana), Gaborone, Botswana.
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, United States.
J Virol Methods. 2023 Jan;311:114647. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2022.114647. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
Accurate HIV and CD4 testing are critical in program implementation, with HIV misdiagnosis having serious consequences at both the client and/or community level. We implemented a comprehensive training and Quality Assurance (QA) program to ensure accuracy of point-of-care HIV and CD4 count testing by lay counsellors during the Botswana Combination Prevention Project (BCPP). We compared the performance of field testing by lay counsellors to results from an accredited laboratory to ascertain accuracy of testing. All trained lay counsellors passed competency assessments and performed satisfactorily in proficiency testing panel evaluations in 2013, 2014, and 2015. There was excellent agreement (99.6 %) between field and laboratory-based HIV test results; of the 3002 samples tested, 960 and 2030 were concordantly positive and negative respectively, with 12 misclassifications (kappa score 0.99, p < 0.0001). Of the 149 HIV-positive samples enumerated for CD4 count in the field using PIMA at a threshold of ≤ 350 cells/µl; there was 86 % agreement with laboratory testing, with only 21 misclassified. The mean difference between field and lab CD4 testing was - 16.16 cells/µl (95 % CI -5.4 to 26.9). Overall, there was excellent agreement between field and laboratory results for both HIV rapid test and PIMA CD4 results. A standard training package to train lay counsellors to accurately perform HIV and CD4 point-of-care testing in field settings was feasible, with point-of-care results obtained by lay counsellors comparable to laboratory-based testing.
准确的 HIV 和 CD4 检测对于项目实施至关重要,HIV 误诊会对客户和/或社区层面产生严重后果。我们实施了一项综合培训和质量保证 (QA) 计划,以确保在博茨瓦纳组合预防项目 (BCPP) 中,由非专业顾问进行的即时护理 HIV 和 CD4 计数检测的准确性。我们将非专业顾问的现场检测结果与经过认证的实验室结果进行比较,以确定检测的准确性。所有经过培训的非专业顾问都通过了能力评估,并在 2013 年、2014 年和 2015 年的熟练程度测试面板评估中表现出色。现场和基于实验室的 HIV 检测结果之间存在极好的一致性(99.6%);在测试的 3002 个样本中,分别有 960 个和 2030 个样本的结果呈阳性和阴性一致,有 12 个样本分类错误(kappa 评分 0.99,p<0.0001)。在现场使用 PIMA 在≤350 个细胞/µl 的阈值下对 149 个 HIV 阳性样本进行 CD4 计数计数,与实验室检测结果的一致性为 86%,只有 21 个样本分类错误。现场和实验室 CD4 检测之间的平均差异为-16.16 个细胞/µl(95%CI-5.4 至 26.9)。总体而言,HIV 快速检测和 PIMA CD4 结果的现场和实验室结果之间存在极好的一致性。使用标准的培训包培训非专业顾问在现场环境中准确进行 HIV 和 CD4 即时护理检测是可行的,非专业顾问获得的即时护理结果与基于实验室的检测结果相当。