Departments of Family Medicine (Howard, Hafid), Medicine (Conen), and Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Jones), McMaster University; ICES McMaster (Gayowsky); Hamilton, Ont.; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Webber, Scott, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); Bruyère Research Institute (Webber, Isenberg, Scott, Hsu, Manuel, Tanuseputro); Division of Palliative Care (Downar), and Departments of Medicine (Isenberg) and Family Medicine (Manuel), University of Ottawa; ICES uOttawa (Manuel, Tanuseputro), Ottawa, Ont.
CMAJ Open. 2022 Nov 8;10(4):E971-E980. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210294. Print 2022 Oct-Dec.
The mix of care provided by family physicians, specialists and palliative care physicians can vary by the illnesses leading to death, which may result in disruptions of continuity of care at the end of life. We measured continuity of outpatient physician care in the last year of life across differing causes of death and assessed factors associated with higher continuity.
We conducted a retrospective descriptive study of adults who died in Ontario between 2013 and 2018, using linked provincial health administrative data. We calculated 3 measures of continuity (usual provider, Bice-Boxerman and sequential continuity), which range from 0 to 1, from outpatient physician visits over the last year of life for terminal illness, organ failure, frailty, sudden death and other causes of death. We used multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate associations between characteristics and a continuity score of 0.5 or greater.
Among the 417 628 decedents, we found that mean usual provider, Bice-Boxerman and sequential continuity indices were 0.37, 0.30 and 0.37, respectively, with continuity being the lowest for those with terminal illness (0.27, 0.23 and 0.33, respectively). Higher number of comorbidities, higher neighbourhood income quintile and all non-sudden death categories were associated with lower continuity.
We found that continuity of physician care in the last year of life was low, especially in those with cancer. Further research is needed to validate measures of continuity against end-of-life health care outcomes.
家庭医生、专科医生和姑息治疗医生提供的护理组合因导致死亡的疾病而异,这可能导致临终关怀连续性中断。我们测量了不同死亡原因导致的生命最后一年的门诊医生护理连续性,并评估了与更高连续性相关的因素。
我们使用省级卫生行政数据进行了一项回顾性描述性研究,该研究纳入了 2013 年至 2018 年期间在安大略省死亡的成年人。我们计算了生命最后一年用于治疗终末期疾病、器官衰竭、衰弱、猝死和其他死亡原因的门诊医生就诊的 3 种连续性指标(常用提供者、Bice-Boxerman 和连续连续性),其范围从 0 到 1。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估了特征与连续性评分为 0.5 或更高之间的关联。
在 417628 名死者中,我们发现常用提供者、Bice-Boxerman 和连续连续性指数的平均值分别为 0.37、0.30 和 0.37,而终末期疾病患者的连续性最低(分别为 0.27、0.23 和 0.33)。合并症数量较多、较高的邻里收入五分位数和所有非猝死类别均与连续性较低相关。
我们发现生命最后一年的医生护理连续性较低,尤其是在癌症患者中。需要进一步研究来验证连续性措施与临终关怀医疗结果的关系。