Jeon Byeng Hun, Lee Chul Ho, Jang Jae Seok, Cho Jun Woo
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
J Chest Surg. 2022 Dec 5;55(6):462-469. doi: 10.5090/jcs.22.044. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is used to treat carotid stenosis, which is associated with cerebral infarction and may result in neurologic deficits such as stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and local nerve injury. To decrease surgery-related complications and improve patient satisfaction with esthetic outcomes, efforts have been made to minimize incision size instead of using a standard longitudinal incision.
We performed a retrospective analysis of 151 cases of CEA, of which 110 used conventional incisions and 41 used high mini-skin incisions (HMIs), from March 2015 to December 2021 at a single institution. Short-term (30-day) postoperative results were evaluated for rates of mortality, stroke, TIA, and cranial/cervical nerve injuries. Risk factors for nerve injury were also assessed.
The HMI group showed significantly (p<0.01) shorter operative and clamp times than the conventional group. The HMI group also had significantly shorter incision lengths (5.3±0.9 cm) than the conventional group (11.5±2.8 cm). The rates of stroke, TIA, and death at 30 days were not significantly different between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in the rate of cranial and cervical nerve injuries, and all injuries were transient. A high lesion level (odds ratio [OR], 9.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.21-28.42; p<0.01) and the clamp time (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.12; p<0.01) were found to be risk factors for nerve injuries.
Use of the HMI in CEA for carotid stenosis was advantageous for its shorter operative time, shorter internal carotid artery clamp time, reduced neurologic complications, and improved esthetics.
颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)用于治疗颈动脉狭窄,颈动脉狭窄与脑梗死相关,可能导致神经功能缺损,如中风、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)和局部神经损伤。为减少手术相关并发症并提高患者对美学效果的满意度,人们努力将切口尺寸最小化,而非采用标准的纵向切口。
我们对2015年3月至2021年12月在单一机构进行的151例CEA病例进行了回顾性分析,其中110例采用传统切口,41例采用高位小皮肤切口(HMI)。评估术后短期(30天)死亡率、中风、TIA和颅/颈神经损伤发生率。还评估了神经损伤的危险因素。
HMI组的手术时间和夹闭时间明显(p<0.01)短于传统组。HMI组的切口长度(5.3±0.9 cm)也明显短于传统组(11.5±2.8 cm)。两组30天时的中风、TIA和死亡率无显著差异。颅神经和颈神经损伤发生率无显著差异,且所有损伤均为短暂性。发现病变水平高(优势比[OR],9.56;95%置信区间[CI],3.21 - 28.42;p<0.01)和夹闭时间(OR,1.07;95% CI,1.03 - 1.12;p<0.01)是神经损伤的危险因素。
在CEA治疗颈动脉狭窄中使用HMI具有手术时间短、颈内动脉夹闭时间短、神经并发症减少和美学效果改善的优势。