Institute of Psychology III, Engineering Psychology and Applied Cognitive Research, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Chair of Traffic and Transportation Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 9;17(11):e0277099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277099. eCollection 2022.
Analyzing the time course of eye movements during scene viewing often indicates that people progress through two distinct modes of visual processing: an ambient mode, which is associated with overall spatial orientation in a scene, followed by a focal mode, which requires central vision of an object. However, the shifts between ambient and focal processing modes have mainly been identified relative to changes in the environment, such as relative to the onset of various visual stimuli but also following scene cuts or subjective event boundaries in dynamic stimuli. The results so far do not allow conclusions about the nature of the two processing mechanisms beyond the influence of externally triggered events. It remains unclear whether people shift back and forth from ambient to focal processing also based on internal triggers, such as switching between different tasks while no external event is given. The present study therefore investigated ambient to focal processing shifts in an active task solving paradigm. The Rubik's Cube task introduced here is a multi-step task, which can be broken down into smaller sub-tasks that are performed serially. The time course of eye movements was analyzed at multiple levels of this Rubik's Cube task, including when there were no external changes to the stimuli but when internal representations of the task were hypothesized to change (i.e., switching between different sub-tasks). Results suggest that initial ambient exploration is followed by a switch to more focal viewing across various levels of task processing with and without external changes to the stimuli. More importantly, the present findings suggest that ambient and focal eye movement characteristics might serve as a probe for the attentional state in task processing, which does not seem to be influenced by changes in task performance.
分析观看场景时的眼球运动时间进程通常表明,人们会经历两种截然不同的视觉处理模式:一种是环境模式,与场景中的整体空间方向相关联;另一种是焦点模式,需要对物体的中心视觉。然而,环境和焦点处理模式之间的转换主要是相对于环境的变化来确定的,例如相对于各种视觉刺激的开始,或者在动态刺激中跟随场景切换或主观事件边界。到目前为止,这些结果并不能得出关于两种处理机制本质的结论,除了外部触发事件的影响。目前还不清楚人们是否也会根据内部触发因素从环境处理模式切换到焦点处理模式,例如在没有外部事件的情况下,在不同任务之间切换。因此,本研究在一个主动任务解决范式中调查了环境到焦点处理的转换。这里引入的魔方任务是一个多步骤任务,可以分解为串行执行的较小子任务。在这个魔方任务的多个层面上分析了眼球运动的时间进程,包括当刺激没有外部变化但任务的内部表示被假设发生变化时(例如,在不同的子任务之间切换)。结果表明,初始环境探索之后,随着任务处理各个层面的变化,会出现从更广泛的观察到更集中的观察的转变,无论刺激是否有外部变化。更重要的是,本研究结果表明,环境和焦点眼球运动特征可能作为任务处理注意力状态的探针,而这似乎不受任务表现变化的影响。