Suppr超能文献

模拟讲评作为护理教育临床教学模拟的一部分:范围综述。

Simulation debriefing as part of simulation for clinical teaching and learning in nursing education: A scoping review.

机构信息

University of Agder, Campus Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway.

Nelson Mandela University, Ocean Sciences Campus, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2023 Mar;10(3):1217-1233. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1426. Epub 2022 Nov 9.

Abstract

AIM

To map the evidence of the simulation debriefing phase in simulation activities of nursing education, to address and inform clinical teaching and learning in nursing.

DESIGN

A scoping review.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature published between 2008-2021 was conducted using CINAHL & ERIC, MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycInfo, the Cochrane Library and JBI Evidence synthesis. Inclusion criteria were primary studies published in English on simulation debriefing at all levels in nursing education.

RESULTS

Of 140 included references, only 80% (N = 112) framed simulation debriefing theoretically either by specific theories/models or as a literature review of the topic. A variety of simulation debriefing methods were identified; however, debriefing methods were only described in 79% (N = 110) of the references. There appears to be a gap in consensus concerning the theoretical or methodological frameworks characterizing simulation debriefing in nursing education. The majority of studies (86%) were conducted at a bachelor's degree level (N = 121).

摘要

目的

绘制护理教育模拟活动中模拟汇报阶段的证据图,以解决和告知护理临床教学。

设计

范围综述。

方法

使用 CINAHL 和 ERIC、MEDLINE、EMBASE、APA PsycInfo、Cochrane 图书馆和 JBI 证据综合,对 2008-2021 年间发表的文献进行了系统综述。纳入标准为发表于英文期刊,在护理教育各个层次上的关于模拟汇报的原始研究。

结果

在 140 篇纳入的参考文献中,只有 80%(N=112)从特定理论/模型或作为该主题文献综述的角度对模拟汇报进行了理论框架构建。确定了各种模拟汇报方法;然而,在 79%(N=110)的参考文献中仅描述了汇报方法。关于护理教育中模拟汇报的理论或方法框架似乎存在共识上的差距。大多数研究(86%)是在学士学位水平上进行的(N=121)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/986a/9912432/d44736e4ea85/NOP2-10-1217-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验