Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Pascal, Université Clermont Auvergne, University Hospital Center Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Auvergne Perinatal Health Network, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Jan;102(1):67-75. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14461. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
Maternal pushing techniques during the second stage of labor may affect women's pelvic floor function. Our main objective was to assess the impact of the type of pushing used at delivery on the mother's medium-term pelvic floor function.
This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02474745) that took place in four French hospitals from 2015 through 2017 (n = 250). Women in labor with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation at term who had undergone standardized training in both of these types of pushing were randomized after cervical dilation ≥7 cm. The exclusion criteria were a previous cesarean, a cesarean delivery in this pregnancy or a fetal heart rate anomaly. In the intervention group, open-glottis (OG) pushing was defined as a prolonged exhalation contracting the abdominal muscles to help move the fetus down the birth canal. Closed-glottis (CG) pushing was defined as Valsalva pushing. The principal outcome was the stage of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) assessed by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification 2 months after delivery. A secondary outcome was incidence of urinary incontinence (UI). The results of our multivariable, modified intention-to-treat analysis are reported as crude relative risks (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals.
Our analysis included 207 women. Mode of birth was similar in both groups. The two groups did not differ for stage II POP: 10 of 104 (9.4%) in the OG group compared with 7 of 98 (7.1%) in the CG group, for a RR 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-3.33, and an adjusted RR of 1.22, 95% CI 0.42-3.6. Similarly, the incidence of UI did not differ: 26.7% in the OG group and 28.6% in the CG group (aRR 0.81, 95% CI 0.42-1.53). Subgroup analysis suggests that for secundiparous and multiparous women, OG pushing could have a protective effect on the occurrence of UI (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.80).
The type of directed pushing used at delivery did not impact the occurrence of pelvic organ prolapse 2 months after delivery. OG pushing may have a protective effect against UI among secundiparous and multiparous women.
产妇在第二产程中的用力方式可能会影响其骨盆底功能。我们的主要目标是评估分娩时用力方式对产妇中期骨盆底功能的影响。
这是一项在法国四家医院进行的随机临床试验(clinicaltrials.gov:NCT02474745)的二次分析,该试验于 2015 年至 2017 年期间进行(n=250)。有单胎头位足月产妇在宫颈扩张≥7cm 后,接受过这两种用力方式的标准化培训,随机分为两组。排除标准为既往剖宫产术、本次妊娠剖宫产术或胎儿心率异常。在干预组中,开声门(OG)用力定义为延长呼气,收缩腹肌以帮助胎儿沿产道下降。闭声门(CG)用力定义为瓦氏用力。主要结局是产后 2 个月用盆腔器官脱垂定量(Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification)评估的盆腔器官脱垂(POP)分期。次要结局是尿失禁(UI)发生率。我们的多变量、修改后的意向治疗分析结果以粗相对风险(RR)及其 95%置信区间报告。
我们的分析包括 207 名女性。两组的分娩方式相似。两组 II 期 POP 无差异:OG 组 10/104(9.4%),CG 组 7/98(7.1%),RR 1.32,95%CI 0.52-3.33,调整 RR 1.22,95%CI 0.42-3.6。同样,UI 发生率无差异:OG 组 26.7%,CG 组 28.6%(aRR 0.81,95%CI 0.42-1.53)。亚组分析表明,对于经产妇和多产妇,OG 用力可能对 UI 的发生有保护作用(RR 0.33,95%CI 0.13-0.80)。
分娩时使用的定向用力方式不会影响产后 2 个月时盆腔器官脱垂的发生。OG 用力可能对经产妇和多产妇的 UI 有保护作用。