Suppr超能文献

分娩时的用力方式是否会影响产后 2 个月的盆底功能?一项实用随机试验——EOLE 研究。

Does the type of pushing at delivery influence pelvic floor function at 2 months postpartum? A pragmatic randomized trial-The EOLE study.

机构信息

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Pascal, Université Clermont Auvergne, University Hospital Center Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Auvergne Perinatal Health Network, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Jan;102(1):67-75. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14461. Epub 2022 Nov 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Maternal pushing techniques during the second stage of labor may affect women's pelvic floor function. Our main objective was to assess the impact of the type of pushing used at delivery on the mother's medium-term pelvic floor function.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02474745) that took place in four French hospitals from 2015 through 2017 (n = 250). Women in labor with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation at term who had undergone standardized training in both of these types of pushing were randomized after cervical dilation ≥7 cm. The exclusion criteria were a previous cesarean, a cesarean delivery in this pregnancy or a fetal heart rate anomaly. In the intervention group, open-glottis (OG) pushing was defined as a prolonged exhalation contracting the abdominal muscles to help move the fetus down the birth canal. Closed-glottis (CG) pushing was defined as Valsalva pushing. The principal outcome was the stage of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) assessed by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification 2 months after delivery. A secondary outcome was incidence of urinary incontinence (UI). The results of our multivariable, modified intention-to-treat analysis are reported as crude relative risks (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 207 women. Mode of birth was similar in both groups. The two groups did not differ for stage II POP: 10 of 104 (9.4%) in the OG group compared with 7 of 98 (7.1%) in the CG group, for a RR 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-3.33, and an adjusted RR of 1.22, 95% CI 0.42-3.6. Similarly, the incidence of UI did not differ: 26.7% in the OG group and 28.6% in the CG group (aRR 0.81, 95% CI 0.42-1.53). Subgroup analysis suggests that for secundiparous and multiparous women, OG pushing could have a protective effect on the occurrence of UI (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

The type of directed pushing used at delivery did not impact the occurrence of pelvic organ prolapse 2 months after delivery. OG pushing may have a protective effect against UI among secundiparous and multiparous women.

摘要

介绍

产妇在第二产程中的用力方式可能会影响其骨盆底功能。我们的主要目标是评估分娩时用力方式对产妇中期骨盆底功能的影响。

材料和方法

这是一项在法国四家医院进行的随机临床试验(clinicaltrials.gov:NCT02474745)的二次分析,该试验于 2015 年至 2017 年期间进行(n=250)。有单胎头位足月产妇在宫颈扩张≥7cm 后,接受过这两种用力方式的标准化培训,随机分为两组。排除标准为既往剖宫产术、本次妊娠剖宫产术或胎儿心率异常。在干预组中,开声门(OG)用力定义为延长呼气,收缩腹肌以帮助胎儿沿产道下降。闭声门(CG)用力定义为瓦氏用力。主要结局是产后 2 个月用盆腔器官脱垂定量(Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification)评估的盆腔器官脱垂(POP)分期。次要结局是尿失禁(UI)发生率。我们的多变量、修改后的意向治疗分析结果以粗相对风险(RR)及其 95%置信区间报告。

结果

我们的分析包括 207 名女性。两组的分娩方式相似。两组 II 期 POP 无差异:OG 组 10/104(9.4%),CG 组 7/98(7.1%),RR 1.32,95%CI 0.52-3.33,调整 RR 1.22,95%CI 0.42-3.6。同样,UI 发生率无差异:OG 组 26.7%,CG 组 28.6%(aRR 0.81,95%CI 0.42-1.53)。亚组分析表明,对于经产妇和多产妇,OG 用力可能对 UI 的发生有保护作用(RR 0.33,95%CI 0.13-0.80)。

结论

分娩时使用的定向用力方式不会影响产后 2 个月时盆腔器官脱垂的发生。OG 用力可能对经产妇和多产妇的 UI 有保护作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e262/9780713/41988110f3d8/AOGS-102-67-g007.jpg

相似文献

4
Pelvic floor muscle strength and the incidence of pelvic floor disorders after vaginal and cesarean delivery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;222(1):62.e1-62.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
5
Association of Delivery Mode With Pelvic Floor Disorders After Childbirth.
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2438-2447. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18315.
6
Pelvic floor dysfunction after vaginal and cesarean delivery among singleton primiparas.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 May;137(2):170-173. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12116. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
8
Early postpartum physical activity and pelvic floor support and symptoms 1 year postpartum.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb;224(2):193.e1-193.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.033. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
10
Postpartum pelvic floor function performance after two different modes of delivery.
Genet Mol Res. 2015 Apr 10;14(2):2994-3001. doi: 10.4238/2015.April.10.9.

本文引用的文献

1
Which elements were significant in reducing obstetric anal sphincter injury? A prospective follow-up study.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Nov 18;21(1):781. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04260-z.
2
A Systematic Review of Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Female Pelvic Floor Disorders.
Urology. 2022 May;163:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.09.018. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
6
Maternal, obstetrical and neonatal risk factors' impact on female urinary incontinence: a systematic review.
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Nov;31(11):2205-2224. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04442-x. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
7
Association between delivery mode and pelvic organ prolapse: A meta-analysis of observational studies.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Apr;235:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.031. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
9
Effects of pushing techniques during the second stage of labor: A randomized controlled trial.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;56(5):606-612. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.02.005.
10
Does a body mass index greater than 25kg/m increase maternal and neonatal morbidity? A French historical cohort study.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017 Sep;46(7):601-608. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jul 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验