Suppr超能文献

利用较少的间质插植针在宫颈癌的腔内和间质近距离放疗中联合应用的剂量学评估。

Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

机构信息

Departments of Radiation Oncology and Radiological Sciences, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Feb;24(2):e13833. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13833. Epub 2022 Nov 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ability of the Venezia advanced multichannel tandem and ring applicator to consistently produce dosimetrically comparable plans utilizing a reduced number of needle channels, to reduce the risk of secondary complications when boosting cervical cancer treatments with high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy.

METHODS

We evaluated 26 fractions from 13 patients who were treated with HDR brachytherapy using the Venezia (Elekta) applicator. The original plans included a full load of 12-16 needles, including both parallel and 30-degree oblique needles. We replanned each original to nine new configurations, with a reduced number of two, three, four, or six needles. Comparisons included differences in percentage dose coverage to 90% of the high-risk clinical target volume, and percentage dose to 2 cm of the bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and bowel. We considered new plans "passing" if they remained within our standards (D90 > 100%; D2 cm  < 85% bladder, <65% rectum, sigmoid, bowel) or did not perform worse than original.

RESULTS

Removing only the two most anterior or the two most posterior needles from both sides showed 80.8% and 61.5% overall passing rate. Removal of the most anterior and posterior four needles together showed 65.4% overall passing rate. Removing all oblique needles showed 19.2% overall passing rate. Removing only left-sided or only right-sided oblique needles showed 46.2% and 23.1% overall passing, respectively. Removing only right-sided or only left-sided parallel needles separately showed 19.2% and 34.6% overall passing, respectively. Removing all parallel needles showed 11.5% overall passing rate.

CONCLUSIONS

As only two replans required a full needle load to maintain dosimetric quality and 40 (76.9%), 36 (34.6%), 18 (69.2%), and 10 (19.2%) replans passed with 2, 3, 4, and 6 needles removed respectively, this indicates the potential for using a lesser number of interstitial needles during combined intracavitary and interstitial HDR brachytherapy while maintaining dosimetric quality.

摘要

目的

评估威尼斯高级多通道串联和环型施源器在减少针道数量的情况下,仍能持续提供可比较的剂量学计划的能力,以降低宫颈癌调强近距离治疗中使用高剂量率(HDR)近距离治疗时发生二次并发症的风险。

方法

我们评估了 13 名患者的 26 个分次的 HDR 近距离治疗数据,这些患者均使用威尼斯(Elekta)施源器治疗。原始计划包括 12-16 根针的全负荷,包括平行和 30 度斜针。我们为每个原始计划重新规划了 9 种新的配置,减少了 2、3、4 或 6 根针的数量。比较包括高危临床靶区 90%的剂量覆盖率百分比差异,以及膀胱、直肠、乙状结肠和肠 2cm 处的剂量百分比差异。如果新计划保持在我们的标准范围内(D90>100%;D2cm<85%膀胱、<65%直肠、乙状结肠、肠)或不比原始计划差,我们认为新计划是“通过”的。

结果

仅从前侧或后侧各去除两根针,总的通过率为 80.8%和 61.5%。同时去除最前和最后四根针的总的通过率为 65.4%。仅去除所有斜针的总的通过率为 19.2%。仅去除左侧或右侧斜针的总的通过率分别为 46.2%和 23.1%。仅去除右侧或左侧平行针的总的通过率分别为 19.2%和 34.6%。仅去除所有平行针的总的通过率为 11.5%。

结论

只有两个计划需要全针负荷来保持剂量学质量,而 40(76.9%)、36(34.6%)、18(69.2%)和 10(19.2%)个计划分别在去除 2、3、4 和 6 根针后通过,这表明在保持剂量学质量的同时,在联合腔内和间质 HDR 近距离治疗中使用较少的间质针是有潜力的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5b2/9924101/c314624139d7/ACM2-24-e13833-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验