Suppr超能文献

用于镥-氧奥曲肽预处理的氨基酸溶液:耐受性研究。

Amino Acid Solutions for Lu-Oxodotreotide Premedication: A Tolerance Study.

作者信息

Courault Pierre, Deville Agathe, Habouzit Vincent, Gervais Frédéric, Bolot Claire, Bournaud Claire, Levigoureux Elise

机构信息

Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Est, 69677 Bron, France.

Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS UMR5292, INSERM U1028, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69677 Bron, France.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 24;14(21):5212. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215212.

Abstract

Background: The co-infusion of amino acid solutions during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy reduces the tubular reabsorption of 177Lu-oxodotreotide, thus minimizing nephrotoxicity. In our nuclear medicine department, the patients received two different types of amino acid perfusion over time: a commercial solution (CS) containing 10% amino acids, and a 2.5% lysine−arginine (LysArg) hospital preparation, produced by a referral laboratory. The aim of the present study was to analyze the tolerance of the two amino acid solutions. Methods: The patient files were analyzed and double-checked. The study parameters comprised the gender, age, primary tumor site, type of amino acid perfusion, adverse events (AE) and WHO AE grades, antiemetic premedication, creatinine, and serum potassium level. Results: From February 2016 to February 2019, 76 patients were treated, for a total 235 cycles. AEs occurred in 71% of the CS cycles (n = 82/116), versus 18% (n = 21/119) in the LysArg group (p < 0.0001). In the CS group, the AEs were mostly WHO grade 4 (n = 24/82), and mostly grade 1 in the LysArg group (n = 13/21). Poisson regression showed a higher risk of AE overall and of grades 3 and 4 in the females and with CS. The mean creatinine clearance was identical before and after the PRRT cycles, whichever amino acid perfusion was used. Conclusions: The lysine−arginine preparation showed better tolerance than the commercial solution. The change to LysArg reduced the antiemetic premedication from four molecules to one.

摘要

背景

在肽受体放射性核素治疗期间联合输注氨基酸溶液可减少¹⁷⁷Lu-奥曲肽的肾小管重吸收,从而将肾毒性降至最低。在我们核医学科,随着时间推移,患者接受了两种不同类型的氨基酸灌注:一种是含10%氨基酸的商业溶液(CS),另一种是由转诊实验室配制的2.5%赖氨酸-精氨酸(LysArg)医院制剂。本研究的目的是分析这两种氨基酸溶液的耐受性。方法:对患者病历进行分析和复查。研究参数包括性别、年龄、原发肿瘤部位、氨基酸灌注类型、不良事件(AE)及世界卫生组织AE分级、止吐预处理、肌酐和血清钾水平。结果:2016年2月至2019年2月,共治疗76例患者,总计235个周期。CS组周期中71%(n = 82/116)发生AE,而LysArg组为18%(n = 21/119)(p < 0.0001)。CS组中,AE大多为世界卫生组织4级(n = 24/82),而LysArg组大多为1级(n = 13/21)。泊松回归显示,总体上女性及使用CS时发生AE以及3级和4级AE的风险更高。无论使用哪种氨基酸灌注,PRRT周期前后的平均肌酐清除率相同。结论:赖氨酸-精氨酸制剂显示出比商业溶液更好的耐受性。改用LysArg可将止吐预处理从四种药物减至一种。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6484/9657593/7a41a7ed4ae4/cancers-14-05212-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验