Zeng Yan, Chen Enhui, Zhang Xuewen, Li Demao, Wang Qinhong, Sun Yuanxia
National Engineering Laboratory for Industrial Enzymes, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiqidao No. 32, Airport Economic Area, Tianjin 300308, China.
National Technology Innovation Center of Synthetic Biology, Tianjin 300308, China.
Foods. 2022 Oct 23;11(21):3326. doi: 10.3390/foods11213326.
In order to alleviate the pressure on environmental resources faced by meat and dairy production and to satisfy the increasing demands of consumers for food safety and health, alternative proteins have drawn considerable attention in the food industry. However, despite the successive reports of alternative protein food, the processing and application foundation of alternative proteins for meat and dairy is still weak. This paper summarizes the nutritional composition and physicochemical characteristics of meat and dairy alternative proteins from four sources: plant proteins, fungal proteins, algal proteins and insect proteins. The difference between these alternative proteins to animal proteins, the effects of their structural features and environmental conditions on their properties, as well as the corresponding mechanism are compared and discussed. Though fungal proteins, algal proteins and insect proteins have shown some advantages over traditional plant proteins, such as the comparable protein content of insect proteins to meat, the better digestibility of fungal proteins and the better foaming properties of algal proteins, there is still a big gap between alternative proteins and meat and dairy proteins. In addition to needing to provide amino acid composition and digestibility similar to animal proteins, alternative proteins also face challenges such as maintaining good solubility and emulsion properties. Their nutritional and physicochemical properties still need thorough investigation, and for commercial application, it is important to develop and optimize industrial technology in alternative protein separation and modification.
为了缓解肉类和乳制品生产所面临的环境资源压力,并满足消费者对食品安全和健康日益增长的需求,替代蛋白在食品工业中受到了广泛关注。然而,尽管替代蛋白食品的报道不断,但肉类和乳制品替代蛋白的加工和应用基础仍然薄弱。本文总结了植物蛋白、真菌蛋白、藻类蛋白和昆虫蛋白这四种来源的肉类和乳制品替代蛋白的营养成分和理化特性。比较并讨论了这些替代蛋白与动物蛋白的差异、其结构特征和环境条件对其性质的影响以及相应机制。尽管真菌蛋白、藻类蛋白和昆虫蛋白相对于传统植物蛋白表现出一些优势,如昆虫蛋白的蛋白质含量与肉类相当、真菌蛋白的消化率更高以及藻类蛋白的发泡性能更好,但替代蛋白与肉类和乳制品蛋白之间仍存在很大差距。除了需要提供与动物蛋白相似的氨基酸组成和消化率外,替代蛋白还面临着保持良好溶解性和乳化性能等挑战。它们的营养和理化性质仍需深入研究,对于商业应用而言,开发和优化替代蛋白分离与改性的工业技术至关重要。