Boyd Eric S, Spietz Rachel L, Kour Manjinder, Colman Daniel R
Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA.
Environ Microbiol. 2023 Jan;25(1):184-198. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.16285. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
Storytelling has been the primary means of knowledge transfer over human history. The effectiveness and reach of stories are improved when the message is appropriate for the target audience. Oftentimes, the stories that are most well received and recounted are those that have a clear purpose and that are told from a variety of perspectives that touch on the varied interests of the target audience. Whether scientists realize or not, they are accustomed to telling stories of their own scientific discoveries through the preparation of manuscripts, presentations, and lectures. Perhaps less frequently, scientists prepare review articles or book chapters that summarize a body of knowledge on a given subject matter, meant to be more holistic recounts of a body of literature. Yet, by necessity, such summaries are often still narrow in their scope and are told from the perspective of a particular discipline. In other words, interdisciplinary reviews or book chapters tend to be the rarity rather than the norm. Here, we advocate for and highlight the benefits of interdisciplinary perspectives on microbiological subjects.
在人类历史上,讲故事一直是知识传播的主要方式。当信息适合目标受众时,故事的有效性和影响力会得到提升。通常,最受欢迎和被传颂的故事是那些有明确目的且从各种角度讲述、涉及目标受众不同兴趣点的故事。无论科学家是否意识到,他们都习惯于通过撰写手稿、进行展示和演讲来讲述自己科学发现的故事。或许不那么常见的是,科学家会撰写综述文章或书籍章节来总结某一特定主题的知识体系,旨在更全面地叙述一系列文献。然而,由于必要性,此类总结的范围往往仍然较窄,且是从特定学科的角度讲述的。换句话说,跨学科综述或书籍章节往往是罕见的而非常态。在此,我们倡导并强调从跨学科视角看待微生物学主题的益处。