Suppr超能文献

低级别胶质瘤患者术前和术后的自我报告和客观评估的神经认知功能。

Pre- and postoperative self-reported and objectively assessed neurocognitive functioning in lower grade glioma patients.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr University Bochum, In der Schornau 23-25, D-44892 Bochum, Germany.

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr University Bochum, In der Schornau 23-25, D-44892 Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2022 Dec;106:185-193. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.10.026. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

Abstract

Due to the tumor itself or its therapy glioma patients may complain on cognitive impairment, while validated neuropsychological testing (NPT) capturing specific neuropsychological domains does not indicate "objective" dysfunction. Little is known on the relevance of this disturbance for patients' everyday life. We aimed to address whether glioma patients treated with state-of-the-art neurosurgical techniques complain on neuropsychological impairment and whether these subjective complaints are disclosed in formal NPT. We assessed both, "objective" and "subjective" neurocognitive functioning in 13 patients with newly diagnosed WHO grade 2 and 3 gliomas, operated between 06/2018 and 12/2020. All underwent both, preoperative and follow-up NPT as well as a semi-structured interview on subjective complaints and specific questionnaires (post-therapeutic) on attention, memory and executive functioning. On group level, no significant changes between preoperative and post-therapeutic NPT occurred. On the individual level, in 3/13 patients new post-therapeutic deficits in objective NPT were detected in specific domains (verbal memory, non-verbal memory, verbal fluency). By contrast, 8/13 patients reported on "subjective" memory impairments post-therapeutically. Furthermore, on specific questionnaires cognitive and emotional executive dysfunction and increased fatigue occurred in patients relative to normative data. Although the findings have to be replicated in larger populations, a discrepancy between "subjective" and "objective" measures was evident. While subjective neurocognitive impairment may simply not represent a true dysfunction, an alternative explanation might be that established standardized NPT is not suitable to detect subtle dysfunction in this population. "Subjective" and "objective" neurocognitive functioning might represent distinct constructs, which should complement each other in patient-centered Neuro-Oncology.

摘要

由于肿瘤本身或其治疗方法,胶质瘤患者可能会抱怨认知障碍,而经过验证的神经心理学测试(NPT)捕捉到特定的神经心理学领域并没有表明“客观”功能障碍。对于患者的日常生活,这种干扰的相关性知之甚少。我们旨在确定是否接受最先进的神经外科技术治疗的胶质瘤患者会抱怨神经心理学障碍,以及这些主观抱怨是否在正式的 NPT 中披露。我们评估了 13 名新诊断为 2 级和 3 级 WHO 级别的胶质瘤患者的“客观”和“主观”神经认知功能,这些患者在 2018 年 6 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受了手术。所有患者均接受了术前和随访 NPT 以及关于主观抱怨的半结构化访谈,以及关于注意力、记忆和执行功能的特定问卷(治疗后)。在组水平上,术前和治疗后 NPT 之间没有发生显著变化。在个体水平上,在 13 名患者中的 3 名中,在特定领域(言语记忆、非言语记忆、言语流畅性)中发现了新的治疗后客观 NPT 缺陷。相比之下,8/13 名患者在治疗后报告了“主观”记忆障碍。此外,在特定的问卷中,患者在认知和情绪执行功能以及疲劳方面相对于正常数据存在功能障碍。尽管这些发现需要在更大的人群中复制,但“主观”和“客观”测量之间存在明显差异。虽然主观神经认知障碍可能并不代表真正的功能障碍,但另一种解释可能是,既定的标准化 NPT 不适合检测该人群中的细微功能障碍。“主观”和“客观”神经认知功能可能代表不同的结构,在以患者为中心的神经肿瘤学中应相互补充。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验