• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)登记数据比较舒尼替尼与伊马替尼剂量递增在二线晚期非 KIT 外显子 9 突变 GIST 患者。

Dutch Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Registry Data Comparing Sunitinib with Imatinib Dose Escalation in Second-Line Advanced Non-KIT Exon 9 Mutated GIST Patients.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Target Oncol. 2022 Nov;17(6):627-634. doi: 10.1007/s11523-022-00926-6. Epub 2022 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11523-022-00926-6
PMID:36374447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9684294/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has improved greatly after the introduction of imatinib. However, primary or secondary resistance to imatinib occurs in the majority of patients. Sunitinib is the standard second line treatment in exon-9 mutated GIST.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the clinical outcomes of sunitinib with imatinib dose escalation in patients with progressive advanced non-KIT exon 9 mutated GIST after failure of first line imatinib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed, retrieving data from a real-life database (Dutch GIST Registry) including patients with GIST treated with sunitinib or imatinib dose escalation after failure on first line imatinib 400 mg daily. Primary outcome measures were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In total, 110 patients were included, 72 (65.5%) patients were treated with sunitinib (group A) and 38 (34.5%) received an imatinib dose escalation (group B). Important prognostic features at baseline, such as tumor size, stage at diagnosis, mitotic count and localization were equally distributed in both groups. No significant difference (p = 0.88) between median PFS in group A [8.7 months (95% CI 5.6-11.3)] and group B [5.6 months, (95% CI 2.6-8.7)] was observed. Moreover, the OS was similar between group A and group B; 63.2 months and 63.4 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study represents a proper sample size cohort containing detailed data on mutational status of patients with advanced GIST. We illustrated that imatinib dose escalation could serve as a good alternative for sunitinib as second-line treatment in patients with a non-KIT exon 9 mutation.

摘要

背景

伊马替尼的引入极大地改善了晚期胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者的预后。然而,大多数患者会出现对伊马替尼的原发性或继发性耐药。舒尼替尼是exon-9 突变 GIST 的标准二线治疗药物。

目的

我们比较了伊马替尼剂量递增与舒尼替尼治疗一线伊马替尼治疗失败后进展的晚期非 KIT exon 9 突变 GIST 患者的临床结局。

患者与方法

进行了一项回顾性研究,从真实世界数据库(荷兰 GIST 登记处)中检索了接受舒尼替尼或伊马替尼剂量递增治疗的 GIST 患者的数据,这些患者在一线伊马替尼 400mg 每日治疗失败后。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。

结果

共纳入 110 例患者,72 例(65.5%)患者接受舒尼替尼治疗(A 组),38 例(34.5%)接受伊马替尼剂量递增治疗(B 组)。两组患者的基线重要预后特征,如肿瘤大小、诊断时的分期、有丝分裂计数和定位,分布均匀。A 组中位 PFS [8.7 个月(95%CI 5.6-11.3)]与 B 组 [5.6 个月,(95%CI 2.6-8.7)]之间无显著差异(p = 0.88)。此外,A 组和 B 组的 OS 相似;分别为 63.2 个月和 63.4 个月。

结论

本研究代表了一个合适的样本量队列,包含了晚期 GIST 患者突变状态的详细数据。我们表明,伊马替尼剂量递增可作为非 KIT exon 9 突变患者二线治疗的舒尼替尼的良好替代药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c703/9684294/f201b9a5a8fd/11523_2022_926_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c703/9684294/56594408deb8/11523_2022_926_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c703/9684294/f201b9a5a8fd/11523_2022_926_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c703/9684294/56594408deb8/11523_2022_926_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c703/9684294/f201b9a5a8fd/11523_2022_926_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Dutch Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Registry Data Comparing Sunitinib with Imatinib Dose Escalation in Second-Line Advanced Non-KIT Exon 9 Mutated GIST Patients.荷兰胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)登记数据比较舒尼替尼与伊马替尼剂量递增在二线晚期非 KIT 外显子 9 突变 GIST 患者。
Target Oncol. 2022 Nov;17(6):627-634. doi: 10.1007/s11523-022-00926-6. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
2
Imatinib dose escalation versus sunitinib as a second line treatment in KIT exon 11 mutated GIST: a retrospective analysis.伊马替尼剂量递增与舒尼替尼作为KIT外显子11突变型胃肠道间质瘤二线治疗的回顾性分析
Oncotarget. 2016 Oct 25;7(43):69412-69419. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5136.
3
Clinical outcomes of imatinib dose escalation versus sunitinib in first-line imatinib-failure gastrointestinal stromal tumour.伊马替尼剂量递增与舒尼替尼用于一线伊马替尼治疗失败的胃肠道间质瘤的临床疗效比较
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct-Nov;53(10-11):1328-1334. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1518484. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
4
Imatinib escalation or sunitinib treatment after first-line imatinib in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients.转移性胃肠间质瘤患者一线伊马替尼治疗后伊马替尼升级或舒尼替尼治疗。
Anticancer Res. 2014 Sep;34(9):5029-36.
5
[The importance of mutational status in prognosis and therapy of GIST].[突变状态在胃肠道间质瘤预后和治疗中的重要性]
Recenti Prog Med. 2015 Jan;106(1):17-22. doi: 10.1701/1740.18950.
6
Primary and secondary kinase genotypes correlate with the biological and clinical activity of sunitinib in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor.原发性和继发性激酶基因型与舒尼替尼在伊马替尼耐药胃肠道间质瘤中的生物学和临床活性相关。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 20;26(33):5352-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.7461. Epub 2008 Oct 27.
7
Genomic Subtypes of GISTs for Stratifying Patient Response to Sunitinib following Imatinib Resistance: A Pooled Analysis and Systematic Review.GISTs 的基因组亚型可预测伊马替尼耐药后舒尼替尼的患者应答:汇总分析和系统评价。
Dis Markers. 2018 Aug 26;2018:1368617. doi: 10.1155/2018/1368617. eCollection 2018.
8
The outcome and predictive factors of sunitinib therapy in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) after imatinib failure - one institution study.舒尼替尼治疗伊马替尼治疗失败的晚期胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)的结果和预测因素-单机构研究。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Mar 22;12:107. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-107.
9
Patterns of care, prognosis, and survival in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) refractory to first-line imatinib and second-line sunitinib.一线伊马替尼治疗耐药的转移性胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者的治疗模式、预后和生存情况。二线舒尼替尼治疗。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 May;19(5):1551-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2120-6. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
10
Sunitinib as a second-line therapy for advanced GISTs after failure of imatinib: relationship between efficacy and tumor genotype in Korean patients.舒尼替尼作为伊马替尼治疗失败后的晚期 GISTs 的二线治疗:韩国患者疗效与肿瘤基因型的关系。
Invest New Drugs. 2012 Apr;30(2):819-27. doi: 10.1007/s10637-010-9593-1. Epub 2010 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical impact of a dose-escalation strategy for lenvatinib in differentiated thyroid cancer.剂量递增策略对分化型甲状腺癌仑伐替尼的临床影响。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2024 Oct;29(10):1435-1443. doi: 10.1007/s10147-024-02581-5. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
2
Individualized Dosing Patterns in the Treatment of Older Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Results of a Registry-Based Observational National Cohort Study Including 871 Patients.个体化剂量模式在老年胃肠道间质瘤患者治疗中的应用:一项基于登记的观察性全国队列研究结果,纳入 871 例患者。
Drugs Aging. 2024 Feb;41(2):165-176. doi: 10.1007/s40266-023-01084-8. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Avapritinib in advanced PDGFRA D842V-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumour (NAVIGATOR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1 trial.阿伐普利尼治疗晚期 PDGFRA D842V 突变胃肠间质瘤(NAVIGATOR):一项多中心、开放标签、1 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jul;21(7):935-946. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30269-2.
2
Clinical outcomes of imatinib dose escalation versus sunitinib in first-line imatinib-failure gastrointestinal stromal tumour.伊马替尼剂量递增与舒尼替尼用于一线伊马替尼治疗失败的胃肠道间质瘤的临床疗效比较
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct-Nov;53(10-11):1328-1334. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1518484. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
3
Reply to Chen, A.; Zhang, X. Comment on "Golčić et al. Evaluation of Systemic Treatment Options for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours. 2023, , 4081".
回复陈,A.;张,X. 对“戈尔契奇等人。胃肠道间质瘤全身治疗方案的评估。2023年,,4081”的评论。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 28;15(23):5619. doi: 10.3390/cancers15235619.
The incidence, mutational status, risk classification and referral pattern of gastro-intestinal stromal tumours in the Netherlands: a nationwide pathology registry (PALGA) study.
荷兰胃肠道间质瘤的发病率、突变状态、风险分类及转诊模式:一项全国性病理登记(PALGA)研究
Virchows Arch. 2018 Feb;472(2):221-229. doi: 10.1007/s00428-017-2285-x. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
4
Imatinib dose escalation versus sunitinib as a second-line treatment against advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A nationwide population-based cohort study.伊马替尼剂量递增与舒尼替尼作为晚期胃肠道间质瘤二线治疗的对比:一项基于全国人群的队列研究。
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 3;8(41):71128-71137. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16795. eCollection 2017 Sep 19.
5
Ten-Year Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic GI Stromal Tumors: Long-Term Analysis of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Italian Sarcoma Group, and Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group Intergroup Phase III Randomized Trial on Imatinib at Two Dose Levels.无法切除或转移性胃肠道间质瘤患者的 10 年无进展生存和总生存:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织、意大利肉瘤研究组和澳大拉西亚胃肠肿瘤试验组间组 3 期随机试验中伊马替尼两种剂量水平的长期分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 20;35(15):1713-1720. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.0228. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
6
Global epidemiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): A systematic review of population-based cohort studies.胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)的全球流行病学:基于人群队列研究的系统评价
Cancer Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;40:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.10.031. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
7
Succinate dehydrogenase-deficient GISTs: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 66 gastric GISTs with predilection to young age.琥珀酸脱氢酶缺陷型 GISTs:66 例胃 GIST 的临床病理、免疫组织化学和分子遗传学研究,这些 GIST 偏爱年轻患者。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2011 Nov;35(11):1712-21. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182260752.
8
Resistance to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.胃肠道间质瘤对酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的耐药性
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Dec 15;15(24):7510-7518. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0190.
9
V600E BRAF mutations are alternative early molecular events in a subset of KIT/PDGFRA wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumours.V600E BRAF突变是KIT/PDGFRA野生型胃肠道间质瘤亚组中的替代性早期分子事件。
J Clin Pathol. 2009 Jul;62(7):613-6. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2009.064550.
10
Heterogeneity of kinase inhibitor resistance mechanisms in GIST.胃肠道间质瘤中激酶抑制剂耐药机制的异质性
J Pathol. 2008 Sep;216(1):64-74. doi: 10.1002/path.2382.