Suppr超能文献

经输尿管镜活检诊断的原发性上尿路尿路上皮癌原位的处理:卡介苗是肾输尿管切除术的替代方法吗?

Management of primary upper urinary tract carcinoma in situ diagnosed by ureteroscopic biopsy: Is bacillus Calmette-Guerin an alternative to nephroureterectomy?

机构信息

Departamento de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Departamento de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2023 May;47(4):221-228. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) represents the gold standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); however, attempts have been made to treat upper urinary tract CIS (UT-CIS) conservatively. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with primary UT-CIS treated in our center by means of RNU vs. bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillations.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with diagnosis of primary UT-CIS between 1990 and 2018. All patients had histological confirmation of UT-CIS in the absence of other concomitant UTUC. Histological confirmation was obtained by ureteroscopy with multiple biopsies. Patients were treated with BCG instillations, RNU or distal ureterectomy. Clinicopathological features and outcomes were compared between RNU and BCG groups.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients and 29 renal units (RUs) were included. Sixteen (57.1%) patients (17 RUs) received BCG. BCG was administered via nephrostomy tube in 4 patients, with a single-J ureteral stent in 5, and using a Double-J stent in 7. Complete response and persistence or recurrence were detected in ten (58.8%) and seven (41.2%) RUs treated with BCG, respectively. Eight (27.6%) RUs underwent RNU, and 4 (13.8%) Rus distal ureterectomy. No differences were found in recurrence-free survival (p=0.841) and cancer-specific survival (p=0.77) between the RNU and BCG groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although RNU remains the gold standard treatment for UT-CIS, our results confirm that BCG instillations are also effective. Histological confirmation of UT-CIS is mandatory before any treatment.

摘要

背景

根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)是上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的金标准治疗方法;然而,人们已经尝试过对保守治疗上尿路 CIS(UT-CIS)。本研究旨在比较我院采用 RNU 与卡介苗(BCG)灌注治疗初发 UT-CIS 患者的结果。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入 1990 年至 2018 年间诊断为原发性 UT-CIS 的患者。所有患者均经组织学证实存在 UT-CIS,且无其他并发 UTUC。组织学确证通过输尿管镜检查和多次活检获得。患者接受 BCG 灌注、RNU 或输尿管下段切除术治疗。比较 RNU 组和 BCG 组的临床病理特征和结局。

结果

共纳入 28 例患者和 29 个肾脏单位(RU)。16 例(57.1%)患者(17 个 RU)接受 BCG 治疗。4 例通过肾造瘘管给予 BCG,5 例通过单 J 输尿管支架,7 例通过双 J 支架。接受 BCG 治疗的 10 个(58.8%)和 7 个(41.2%)RU 完全缓解,分别有 7 个(41.2%)和 10 个(58.8%)RU 出现持续性或复发。8 例(27.6%)RU 行 RNU,4 例(13.8%)RU 行输尿管下段切除术。RNU 组与 BCG 组在无复发生存率(p=0.841)和癌症特异性生存率(p=0.77)方面无差异。

结论

尽管 RNU 仍然是 UT-CIS 的金标准治疗方法,但我们的结果证实 BCG 灌注也是有效的。在任何治疗前都必须进行 UT-CIS 的组织学确证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验