Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas, 7232 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX, 75231, USA.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Clin Auton Res. 2022 Dec;32(6):485-495. doi: 10.1007/s10286-022-00903-z. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
Normal pregnancy is associated with vast adjustments in cardiovascular autonomic control. Sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity has been reported to be attenuated during pregnancy in animal models, but most studies in humans are cross-sectional and findings from longitudinal case studies are inconclusive. It remains unclear how sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity is altered longitudinally during pregnancy within an individual in different body postures. Therefore, this study examined the impact of posture on sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity in 24 normal-weight normotensive pregnant women. Spontaneous sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity was assessed during early (6-11 weeks) and late (32-36 weeks) pregnancy and 6-10 weeks postpartum in the supine posture and graded head-up tilt (30° and 60°). In addition, data from the postpartum period were compared with (and no different to) 18 age-matched non-pregnant women to confirm that the postpartum period was reflective of a non-pregnant condition (online supplement). When compared with postpartum (-3.8 ± 0.4 bursts/100 heartbeats/mmHg), supine sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity was augmented during early pregnancy (-5.9 ± 0.4 bursts/100 heartbeats/mmHg, P < 0.001). However, sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity at 30° or 60° head-up tilt was not different between any phase of gestation (P > 0.05). When compared to supine, sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity at 60° head-up tilt was significantly blunted during early (Δ2.0 ± 0.7 bursts/100 heartbeats/mmHg, P = 0.024) and late (Δ1.5 ± 0.6 bursts/100 heartbeats/mmHg, P = 0.049) pregnancy but did not change postpartum (Δ0.4 ± 0.6 bursts/100 heartbeats/mmHg, P = 1.0). These data show that time-course changes in sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity are dependent on the posture it is examined in and provides a foundation of normal blood pressure regulation during pregnancy for future studies in women at risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes.
正常妊娠伴随着心血管自主控制的巨大调整。有报道称,在动物模型中,妊娠期间的交感神经反射敏感性会减弱,但大多数人类的研究都是横断面研究,纵向病例研究的结果尚无定论。目前尚不清楚在不同体位下,个体妊娠期间的交感神经反射敏感性如何随时间发生变化。因此,本研究检测了 24 名正常体重、血压正常的孕妇在仰卧位和分级头高位(30°和 60°)时体位对交感神经反射敏感性的影响。此外,还将产后数据与(且与)18 名年龄匹配的非孕妇进行了比较,以确认产后阶段反映了非妊娠状态(在线补充)。与产后(-3.8±0.4 次/100 次心跳/mmHg)相比,仰卧位时妊娠早期的交感神经反射敏感性增强(-5.9±0.4 次/100 次心跳/mmHg,P<0.001)。然而,在妊娠的任何阶段,30°或 60°头高位的交感神经反射敏感性均无差异(P>0.05)。与仰卧位相比,60°头高位时,妊娠早期(Δ2.0±0.7 次/100 次心跳/mmHg,P=0.024)和晚期(Δ1.5±0.6 次/100 次心跳/mmHg,P=0.049)的交感神经反射敏感性明显减弱,但产后无变化(Δ0.4±0.6 次/100 次心跳/mmHg,P=1.0)。这些数据表明,交感神经反射敏感性的时程变化取决于检测时的体位,并为未来研究妊娠结局不良风险的女性提供了妊娠期间正常血压调节的基础。