Department TeSAF, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 17;17(11):e0277048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277048. eCollection 2022.
To improve the dietary habits of the population, the EU, within the Farm to Fork strategy (F2F), is strongly supporting the Nutri-Score (NS) Front Of Pack (FOP) label. Under the NS system, Geographical Indications (GIs) are generally scored as "unhealthy" food, given the predominance of products of animal origin among GIs which are, notoriously, high-fat products. This study aims to determine the impact of the NS label on consumers' preferences for two Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) cheeses, in comparison with generic ones. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) was conducted on 600 Italian consumers through the estimation of a Random Parameter Logit model. Results highlighted that Italian consumers are generally not familiar with the NS and perceive it as a positive characteristic of the product, even if it is signalling an unhealthy choice (D score). However, consumers aware of the Nutri-Score meaning are willing to pay less to buy a product considered "unhealthy" according to this system. Furthermore, we found that consumers who already knew the NS system have homogeneous behaviours in rejecting the product, independently of the association with a PDO certification. This result has important implications on the agri-food sector. If the Nutri-Score becomes mandatory in the EU, consumers might refuse many GIs due to their negative Nutri-Score values. However, the quality of these products is recognized and protected worldwide. In this vein, the GI policy could be questioned by the F2F strategy: both of them aims to reduce information asymmetry producing, at the same time, contrasting results. Within the Geographical Indication policy, the PDO and PGI goods are protected for their quality attributes, which are strictly linked to their geographical origin of the products and traditional know-how. However, the EU adoption of the Nutri-Score could damage these products, reducing their perceived quality/value.
为改善人口的饮食习惯,欧盟在“从农场到餐桌”(Farm to Fork,F2F)战略中大力支持“营养评分”(Nutri-Score,NS)前置标签。在 NS 系统下,由于地理标志(Geographical Indications,GIs)产品中动物源性产品居多,通常被评为“不健康”食品,而这些产品众所周知是高脂肪产品。本研究旨在确定 NS 标签对消费者对两种受保护原产地名称(PDO)奶酪的偏好的影响,与普通奶酪进行比较。通过对 600 名意大利消费者进行离散选择实验(Discrete Choice Experiment,DCE),采用随机参数对数模型进行估计。结果表明,意大利消费者通常不熟悉 NS,他们认为 NS 是产品的一个积极特征,即使它表明了一个不健康的选择(D 评分)。然而,那些已经了解 NS 含义的消费者愿意支付更少的钱来购买被认为是不健康的产品,根据这个系统。此外,我们发现,那些已经知道 NS 系统的消费者在拒绝产品方面表现出相似的行为,而与 PDO 认证无关。这一结果对农业食品部门具有重要意义。如果 NS 在欧盟成为强制性要求,消费者可能会因为其负的 NS 值而拒绝许多 GI。然而,这些产品的质量在全球范围内得到认可和保护。在这种情况下,GI 政策可能会受到 F2F 战略的质疑:两者都旨在减少信息不对称,同时产生相反的结果。在地理标志政策下,PDO 和 PGI 商品因其质量属性而受到保护,这些属性与产品的地理来源和传统知识密切相关。然而,欧盟采用 NS 可能会损害这些产品,降低它们的感知质量/价值。