Suppr超能文献

老年颈内动脉狭窄患者的支架置入术:临床疗效分析

Stenting for elderly patients with internal carotid artery stenosis: analysis of clinical efficacy.

作者信息

Ye Ziming, Huang Chao, Wang Lizhou, Zhou Shi, Li Xing, Xu Min

机构信息

Department of Interventional Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University Guiyang 550004, Guizhou, China.

出版信息

Am J Transl Res. 2022 Oct 15;14(10):7128-7134. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in elderly patients with internal carotid artery stenosis (ICS).

METHODS

Ninety elderly ICS patients admitted between January 2019 - July 2021 were selected and divided into a control group and a research group according to different treatment method. The 42 cases in the control group were received carotid endarterectomy and the 48 cases in the research group were treated with CAS. The effects of the two intervention methods on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, complication rate, oxidative stress, inflammatory cytokines and cognitive function were observed and evaluated.

RESULTS

Compared to baseline (before treatment), the research group showed significantly reduced scores of NIHSS and activities of daily living, appreciably decreased levels of malonaldehyde, interleukin-6 and high-sensitivity C-reactive-protein, but increased superoxide dismutase, Rapid Verbal Retrieve score and Digit Span Test score after treatment. Also, the same trends were found when comparing the above results with those of the control group after treatment. The two groups showed a comparable complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The above data indicate a definite clinical efficacy and a favorable safety profile of CAS for ICS in the elderly. CAS can effectively reduce the oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines of patients and enhance their cognitive function.

摘要

目的

本回顾性研究旨在探讨颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)治疗老年颈内动脉狭窄(ICS)患者的临床疗效及安全性。

方法

选取2019年1月至2021年7月收治的90例老年ICS患者,根据不同治疗方法分为对照组和研究组。对照组42例行颈动脉内膜切除术,研究组48例行CAS治疗。观察并评估两种干预方法对美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分、并发症发生率、氧化应激、炎性细胞因子及认知功能的影响。

结果

与基线(治疗前)相比,研究组治疗后NIHSS评分及日常生活活动能力评分显著降低,丙二醛、白细胞介素-6及高敏C反应蛋白水平明显下降,但超氧化物歧化酶、快速言语回忆评分及数字广度测试评分升高。将上述结果与治疗后对照组结果比较,也发现了相同趋势。两组并发症发生率相当。

结论

上述数据表明CAS治疗老年ICS具有确切的临床疗效及良好的安全性。CAS可有效降低患者的氧化应激及炎性细胞因子水平,增强其认知功能。

相似文献

6
Cognitive changes after surgery vs stenting for carotid artery stenosis.
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):691-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.253. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
7
[Clinical analysis of carotid artery stenting with severe stenosis and extracranial distortion under proximal protection technique].
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 3;99(45):3568-3573. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.45.008.
10
Impact of frailty on 30-day death, stroke, or myocardial infarction in severe carotid stenosis: Endarterectomy versus stenting.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;222:107469. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107469. Epub 2022 Oct 8.

本文引用的文献

4
Overview and Diagnostic Accuracy of Near Infrared Spectroscopy in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Nov;62(5):695-704. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.08.022. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
9
Prevalence and Clinical Predictors of Intracranial Hemorrhage Following Carotid Artery Stenting for Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis.
World Neurosurg. 2021 Nov;155:e353-e361. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.063. Epub 2021 Aug 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验