Suppr超能文献

熟练护理设施质量评级与冠状动脉旁路移植术后的手术结果。

Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Rating and Surgical Outcomes Following Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.; Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.; VA Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan..

Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024;36(3):313-320. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.11.007. Epub 2022 Nov 17.

Abstract

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services created a 5-star quality rating system to evaluate skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). Patient discharge to lower-star quality SNFs has been shown to adversely impact surgical outcomes. Recent data has shown that over 20% of patients are discharged to an SNF after CABG, but the link between SNF quality and CABG outcomes has not been established. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of SNF quality ratings on postoperative outcomes after CABG. Retrospective cohort review of Medicare patients undergoing CABG and discharged to an SNF between the years 2016-2017. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to the star rating of the SNF with receipt of care after discharge (ie, below average, average, above average). Risk-adjusted 30-day to 1-year outcomes of mortality, readmission, and SNF length of stay were calculated and compared using multivariable logistic regression and Poisson models across SNF quality categories. Of the 73,164 Medicare patients in our sample, 15,522 (21.2%) were discharged to an SNF. Patients in below average SNFs were more likely to be younger, Black, Medicare/Medicaid dual eligible, and have more comorbidities. Compared to above average SNFs, patients discharged to below average SNFs experienced higher risk-adjusted 30-day mortality (2.1% vs 1.6%, P<0.02), readmission (21.6% vs 19.3%, P<0.01) and SNF length of stay (17.3d vs 16.5d, P<0.0001). Within 90-days, below average SNFs experienced higher risk-adjusted readmission rates (31.7% vs 30.0%, P<0.004). Outcomes at 1-year were not statistically significant. Medicare beneficiaries discharged to lower quality SNFs experienced worse postoperative outcomes after CABG. Identifying best practices at high performing SNFs, to potentially implement at low performing facilities, may improve equitable care for patients.

摘要

医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心创建了一个 5 星级质量评级系统,以评估熟练护理设施(SNF)。已经表明,患者转移到质量较低的 SNF 会对手术结果产生不利影响。最近的数据表明,超过 20%的患者在 CABG 后被转移到 SNF,但 SNF 质量与 CABG 结果之间的联系尚未建立。本研究的目的是评估 SNF 质量评级对 CABG 术后结果的影响。对 2016-2017 年间接受 CABG 并转移到 SNF 的 Medicare 患者进行回顾性队列研究。根据出院后接受护理的 SNF 的星级(即平均水平以下、平均水平、平均水平以上),将患者分为 3 组。使用多变量逻辑回归和泊松模型计算并比较了 30 天至 1 年的死亡率、再入院率和 SNF 住院时间的风险调整后结果,并在 SNF 质量类别之间进行比较。在我们的样本中,有 73164 名 Medicare 患者,其中 15522 名(21.2%)被转移到 SNF。在平均水平以下的 SNF 中,患者更年轻、黑人、医疗保险/医疗补助双重资格,并且合并症更多。与平均水平以上的 SNF 相比,被转移到平均水平以下的 SNF 的患者经历了更高的风险调整后 30 天死亡率(2.1%比 1.6%,P<0.02)、再入院率(21.6%比 19.3%,P<0.01)和 SNF 住院时间(17.3d 比 16.5d,P<0.0001)。在 90 天内,平均水平以下的 SNF 经历了更高的风险调整后再入院率(31.7%比 30.0%,P<0.004)。1 年的结果没有统计学意义。被转移到低质量 SNF 的 Medicare 受益人的 CABG 术后结果更差。确定高绩效 SNF 的最佳实践,并有可能在低绩效设施中实施,可能会改善患者的公平护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验